In the evaluation of professional titles, there are certain requirements for the application of professional titles, such as education level, working years, etc., but the requirements for age are not very strict.
However, this is a general situation, and there are other circumstances, some professional title reviews are conditionally required, such as junior professional title reviews, the applicant's age is generally required to be 22 years old or above;
If it is necessary to review the review of intermediate professional titles, then the age requirement is 25 years old or above, and the senior professional title review requirements are 30 years old or above, and the applicant must also have certain professional experience, such as the number of years of experience in the relevant professional field, and the young people are difficult to achieve the required number of years of work.
However, not all title reviews will have age restrictions, and I hope you have a certain understanding of these.
In recent years, the evaluation of talent has moved away from focusing on age and is largely dependent on the ability and contribution of evaluators to evaluate and appoint. Persons may be hired irrespective of age if their abilities and contributions meet the criteria for appointment. If your academic qualifications and junior title year are eligible, you can also participate in the title review if you are not old enough.
The unfairness in the selection of professional titles has become a criticism, and the call for a complete reform of the evaluation of professional titles has been high.
In recent years, all localities have also responded positively and explored many ways to reform the evaluation of professional titles: Shandong Province has launched measures for farmers to evaluate professional titles; Jiangsu Province has launched measures for enterprises to independently evaluate professional titles; There are also some places that have broken the routine and launched a green channel for professional title review.
"It is difficult to find employment at the age of 40".It is right to break the rules and regulations in the evaluation of professional titles. However, since it is a break of the rules, the only criterion should be whether it is not a "talent", and there should be no artificial distinction between "talents under 40 years old" and "talents over 40 years old".
The standard of "talent" should no longer be given the boundary of "age", because "people under 40 years old" may be "talents", and "people over 40 years old" may also be "talents", especially many "people over 40 years old" have struggled for a lifetime and paid for a lifetime, it is because of the rules and regulations of the original title selection, there have been unfair results, seeing that the rules and regulations of the title selection have been broken, they also have a "day of emergence", and the problem at this time appeared "over 40 years old" and " Isn't the distinction between "under 40" unfair to "people under 40"? Can they only "look and see"?
There is a "40-year-old employment difficulty" phenomenon in the society, and the green channel for professional title evaluation should no longer be difficult for "people over 40 years old". To allow high-skilled talents to have a broader space for development and create a good social atmosphere for the cultivation of high-skilled talents, we need a green channel for title review, but this green channel should not intercept "people over 40 years old".
The titles of courier brothers and farmers have broken the rules and regulations, and the title review should no longer "judge heroes by age"! Of course, this is a "young talent", the problem is that with the age division changes, "people over 40 years old" are not old people either!