The incident of the Israeli army accidentally killing hostages in Gaza has aroused widespread concern, but is the IDF's statistics credible?Is it doubtful that the Israeli army's two major slogans: the complete elimination of Hamas and the rescue of all hostages?
How ironic is it that Hamas did not execute hostages at a critical juncture in the war, while the Israeli army shot and killed shirtless hostages with white flags?The two slogans of the Israeli army's entry into Gaza are ridiculous.
The hostages who were shot were older, and most likely had already served in the military, and they had an understanding of the situation of their own army, and their survival calls for help were also quite "life-seeking".
But they were all killed on the spot by Israeli soldiers. The unit in which the hostages were shot this time was the Bislamach Brigade, an Israeli infantry school, and the reality of the situation calls into question the actions of the IDF.
If these three people were not Israeli hostages, but ordinary people in Gaza, would there still be such a high level of attention?How much water will there be in the data on the results of the "Hamas" shot by the Israeli army?
The Israeli army's behavior of "killing good people and risking meritorious deeds" in the fighting in Gaza has even killed its own people, which has made people question the behavior of the Israeli army. The IDF caught a large number of "Hamas" in propaganda
But the reality casts doubt on whether these are true. The "Hamas" displayed by the Israeli army to the outside world may not be the real Hamas, but some ordinary people have been wronged.
Is it too optimistic that the Israeli army has carried out more than 20,000 air strikes in Gaza and has committed more than 20 combat brigades?Is the Israeli army's actions questionable?