According to the whistleblower "quasi-boss Wang Chenggong", Chen Zhipeng mainly earns income through live broadcasting, but he has not fully filed tax returns in the past two years, and the amount involved in the supplementary payment is as high as 11 million yuan. The accusation drew the involvement of the tax authorities, and Chen himself admitted to the tax arrears in response. This makes the incident directly linked to issues such as financial transparency, tax compliance, and so on, and is the focus of public attention.
In the exposure of former employees, in addition to tax issues, Chen Zhipeng was also accused of failing to sign labor contracts with employees, dissolving the company in violation of regulations, defaulting on employee compensation, and abusing employees during his work. These accusations make the tax issue no longer exist in isolation, but is related to the company's internal management, employee rights and interests, etc. This makes the incident not only financially involved, but also all aspects of corporate governance and labor relations.
In his response, Chen Zhipeng admitted the problem of tax arrears and said that he had paid it back. Regarding the accusations of former employees, he clarified on the grounds that "cold violence in the workplace, PUA, and disregard for the interests of businesses are trumped-up charges", and said that he would take the other party to court. This response has calmed the tax issue to some extent, but it has also raised more concerns about the company's internal management and employee relations.
Chen Zhipeng's former employee mentioned that the reason for not signing the employment contract was "because of the situation and many concerns", and said that he had psychological problems during his work. This statement brought the issue of labor relations to the fore and made the matter even more complicated. Whether it is the pursuit of legitimate rights and interests by employees or the loopholes in the company's management are worth digging into.
The society's response to Chen Zhipeng was mixed. Some fans felt that his response showed a determination to actively cooperate and make amends, while others questioned his misconduct in the company's management and employee relations. This disagreement reflects the public's expectations of artists and company management, as well as the pursuit of truth.
The fermentation of this incident is inseparable from the society's supervision requirements for public figures. Chen Zhipeng's tax issues are not only personal behavior, but also touch on issues of common concern to society, such as corporate governance and employee rights. In the entertainment industry and even the whole society, the words, deeds and responsibilities of public figures need to be more deeply considered and supervised.
In fact, both artists and companies should face the public and employees with a more responsible attitude, and jointly build a more just and transparent society.
Netizens said:
What do you think about this?