Recently, Australia, together with the United States and the United Kingdom, jointly announced that it would targetChinese submarinesA series of joint detection, surveillance, and crackdown actions were carried out. The move was disappointing, as Australia had previously shown signs of moving closer to China. In AlbaNiceWhen he came to power, it was widely believed that Australia would pursue a pro-China policy and maintain equidistant relations with China and the United States, and there was even a view that Alba would be arrangedNiceSome of the initiatives are in return for China's support. However, recent actions suggest that Australia appears to be returning to the Morrison-era stance on China in the past.
Australia has not only organized joint air and sea patrols with the United States against China, but has also strengthened its cooperation with the United Kingdom and the United StatesMilitaryCooperate. The defense ministers of the AUKUS alliance said they will strengthen cooperation in high-tech fields such as deep space radar, artificial intelligence and quantum computing systems to enhance the combat effectiveness of the three countries and counter China-related threats on a global scale. In addition, the three countries plan to carry out missions in the waters of the Pacific OceanNavyOfficers use artificial intelligence algorithms to quickly process sonar data collected by Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States for better trackingChinese submarines。This series of actions has caused dissatisfaction and doubts about Australia.
To understand Australia's behaviour, we need to look beyond democratic values or political positions, as well as from Anglo-Saxon ethnography. Countries such as Australia, Great Britain, and Canada have been forming alliances against other countries for many years, and this is rooted in the "ethnographic" influence of the Anglo-Saxons. Due to the factor of race, these countries prefer to be on the same side as other Anglo-Saxon countries, holding their ground even in the face of the loss of their own interests, ignoring justice and reason.
Australia is a country in the southern hemisphere at the junction of the South Pacific Ocean and the eastern Indian Ocean, with a vast territory and abundant resources, and if it develops its own country with peace of mind, it can play an important role in the world. However, it has been following the United States in all sortsMilitaryAction and confrontation, the reason behind this behavior is precisely the result of the "ethnography" of the Anglo-Saxons.
Australia's attitudes and actions towards the China-Australia relationship have always been complex and changing. While there has been speculation that Australia will remain neutral with China or pursue a pro-China policy, recent developments suggest that Australia has taken a more provocative and offensive stance against China. Australia's joint action with the United States and the United Kingdom andChinese submarinesThe blow underscores the possibility of a return to its past stance on China.
To better understand Australia's actions, we need to consider the impact of the Anglo-Saxon "ethnography" in Sino-Australian relations. This theory explains why Australia has always formed alliances with Anglo-Saxon states against other countries. More than just democratic values or political positions, ethnicity has had a significant impact on Australia's actions.
To sum up, Australia is rightChinese submarinesThe initiative to take joint action has been disappointing and questionable. When analyzing its behavior, it is important to take into account the complexity and changes in Australia, as well as the impact of the Anglo-Saxon "ethnography" on Sino-Australian relations. It is only through in-depth analysis and understanding that we can better interpret Australia's behaviour and provide useful reflections for the future development of China-Australia relations.