After the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, China did not usher in peaceful liberation, but fell into the whirlpool of civil war. At that time, the Kuomintang army led by Chiang Kai-shek was nearly 4 million people, and the civil war seemed to him to be in no suspense. However, at the National Defense Conference chaired by Chiang Kai-shek in early August 1948, the report of his "Minister of National Defense" He Yingqin admitted the fact that nearly 3 million troops had been lost in the past three years, which was the first time that Chiang Kai-shek took the initiative to conduct a review.
Although Chiang Kai-shek attributed the blame to the corruption of the generals in front, Bai Chongxi, the "chief of Central China", did not see it that way. Bai Chongxi believes that the main reason is Chiang Kai-shek's blind command. At the meeting, Bai Chongxi even publicly blamed Chiang Kai-shek, which embarrassed Chiang Kai-shek. Bai Chongxi, known as "Little Zhuge ", was the warlord leader of the Gui family and a first-class general of the Kuomintang army.
Bai Chongxi showed outstanding military talent during the anti-Japanese period, formulated the Taierzhuang battle plan, and in 1939 in Kunlun Pass, Guangxi, he struck the Japanese army hard, and was known as a famous anti-Japanese general. He was one of the few high-ranking Kuomintang generals who liked to read *** works. After the loss of Taiyuan, he carefully read "On Protracted War" and deeply admired the foresight of science.
By the time of the civil war, three major battles became a decisive link: the Liaoshen Campaign, the Huaihai Campaign, and the Pingjin Campaign. Among the three major battles, the largest was the Huaihai Campaign commanded by Su Yu, and it was also a battle that decided the situation in the whole country. At that time, the size of our army was 600,000, while the Kuomintang had 800,000. Before the start of the Huaihai Campaign, Bai Chongxi put forward the suggestion that "to defend the river, we must defend the Huai," and advocated adopting defensive operations and relying on the terrain of the valley to complete the task of defending the river.
However, Chiang Kai-shek did not heed the advice. In the end, the 800,000 ** was picked up by the 600,000 elites of our army like a devastating state. Bai Chongxi was already dissatisfied with Chiang Kai-shek's blind command, so he complained at the National Defense Conference and publicly criticized Chiang Kai-shek. Chiang Kai-shek responded with a smile on the spot, but when he returned to his residence, he scolded Bai Chongxi for his ill intentions. In Chiang Kai-shek's view, greed for money may be possible, but it must not violate his power.
After that, Bai Chongxi became disillusioned with Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang. According to Bai Chongxi's memoirs, when he inspected Jiangfang in 1949, he saw that many officers were still playing mahjong, and he was drunk and dreamed of death. He understood that Chiang Kai-shek's army was hopeless. With the launch of the battle of crossing the river, the defense of the Qianli River was vulnerable, and *** issued an exciting notice: "Millions of heroes have crossed the river, and it is advisable to chase the poor with the remaining bravery." ”
The Heroes and Decisions Behind the Strife: The Military Duel Between Bai Chongxi and Chiang Kai-shek Revealed.
The military duel between Chiang Kai-shek and Bai Chongxi is a high-profile chapter in modern Chinese history. This article details the background of the Chinese Civil War after the Sino-Japanese War and the plight of the Kuomintang army under Chiang Kai-shek, as well as Bai Chongxi's important role in this historical period. Commentaries on this period of history can be considered from multiple perspectives.
First, the article mentions that Chiang Kai-shek admitted to losing nearly 3 million troops at a national defense conference, marking the first time he reviewed his own decision. This kind of self-reflective attitude is not common among leaders, especially in the context of war. However, Chiang Kai-shek shifted the blame to the corruption of the generals in the front, which may have been a political tool, but it also reflected the corruption and internal contradictions of the political system at that time.
Secondly, Bai Chongxi's bravery and outspokenness were very rare in this period. As the warlord leader of the Gui lineage, he dared to publicly accuse Chiang Kai-shek of overstepping his command, showing his sense of responsibility to the country and the army. Bai Chongxi's performance during the anti-Japanese period also proved that he was an excellent military general, but his dissatisfaction with Chiang Kai-shek during the civil war made him a historical spotlight.
The Huaihai Campaign became the decisive battle of the civil war, and the article pointed out that Bai Chongxi put forward the proposal of "defending the river must defend the Huai" before the war, and advocated the adoption of defensive operations. However, Chiang Kai-shek failed to heed this advice, which led to a rout in the end. This reflected the dilemma of the KMT's internal decision-making at that time and the stubbornness of Chiang Kai-shek, and also highlighted the contradictions and mistakes among the leadership.
Finally, Bai Chongxi's 1949 inspection of Jiangfang saw officers playing mahjong, indicating his disappointment that the Kuomintang army had been reduced to a hopeless state. During this period, the outcome of the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party had become clearer and clearer, and Bai Chongxi's vision and admiration for *** also deepened his disappointment with the Kuomintang.
Overall, this history provides us with a profound revelation that at critical moments in the country, it is the decisions of the leaders and the commander-in-chief of the army that can have a huge impact on the direction of the war. This military duel between Bai Chongxi and Chiang Kai-shek is not only an embarrassing history, but also a profound reflection on power and loyalty.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!