Last year's Dragon Boat Festival, a disability in Xianju County, Taizhou, ZhejiangFarmersYing Yihong is in trouble. Ying Yihong slaughtered a pig at home and distributed its meat to relatives and friends. The rest of the pork was sold by his wife at the entrance of the village, and a total of 15625 kg, income 700 yuan. However, what was supposed to be an act of justifiable financial compensation for the family caught the attention of local law enforcement officials for the unlicensed slaughter. On the spot, law enforcement officers seized the remaining 3065 kg of pork and 2 cutting knives, and with ".Regulations on the Administration of Pig SlaughteringOn the basis of the corresponding Yihong, a fine of 50,000 yuan should be imposed.
Ying Yihong expressed helplessness and grievance, he is a disabled right armFarmersThe pig was raised by home, without the addition of any banned substances and disease. He felt that he could not afford the fine and hoped that the law enforcement authorities would reduce the penalty or reduce the amount of the fine, but the law enforcement officers turned a deaf ear to his actual situation and demands.
For Ying Yihong, facing this huge fine means a heavy blow to him and his family. When he was disheartened, a glimmer of hope appeared-Taizhou CityDepartment of JusticeIt was provided for Ying YihongLawsassistance, assignment of specialistsLawyerThe team defended and mediated on his behalf. PassedLawyeranalysis andCourtsof the trial, finallyCourtsIt was found that Ying Yihong's illegal conduct was true, but because the circumstances were minor, the first offense, and the expression of remorse, it met the conditions for mitigating or commuting punishment under the "Administrative Punishment Law". CourtsThe original penalty decision was revoked, the fine was reduced to 5,000 yuan, and the seized pork and knives were returned.
Department of JusticeFor Ying YihongLawsThe aid was undoubtedly a relief and a righteous response to him. LawyerThe team's professional defense and mediation won Ying Yihong a fair judgment result, and also made him full of gratitude to the judicial system. Ying Yihong said that he finally got justice and fairness in treatment, and at the same time realized his mistake and would not sell self-slaughtered pork in the future. YesDepartment of JusticewithLawyerI would like to express my heartfelt thanks for my help, and even more so thanksCourtslet him see itLawsThe warmth of the light.
Ying Yihong's case has attracted a lot of attention and has sparked extensive discussions. Many believe that although Ying Yihong violated the ".Regulations on the Administration of Pig SlaughteringBut he did not maliciously or intentionally violate the rules, nor did it cause serious consequences, and the original fine of 50,000 yuan was too harsh and unreasonable. CourtsThe results of the mediation are more in line with the actual situation andLawsThe principle reflects the characteristics of law enforcement with strength and warmth. On the other hand, there are also some people who believe that Ying Yihong's behavior involves hidden dangers of food safety, and if it is not severely punished, it may encourage other people's illegal behaviors, rightHogsThe regulation and effectiveness of slaughter management can have a negative impact, so it should be insisted on following the regulations and not being lenient and accommodating.
Opinions on the case are mixed. One of the schools of thought thinksCourtsThe mediation was correct, and taking into account Ying Yihong's actual situation and the first offense, a reasonable reduction of his fine was made. PassedLawsThe assistance is provided to the disadvantaged and reflects the fairness and warmth of justice. The other faction holds the view that law enforcement should severely punish illegal acts in order to defend itHogsThe seriousness and authority of slaughter management.
For me personally, I would like to emphasize this:JudiciaryThe role played in this case. JudiciaryNot only provided under Ying Yihong's applicationLawsassistance, giving him fair and warm treatment, and achieving the satisfaction and gratitude of the parties through mediation. This case to:SocialA message was delivered, namelyJudiciaryA balance should be sought through prudent judgment and reasonable mediation based on the specific circumstances of the case and the actual needs of the partiesLawsTreatment, both maintainedSocialOrder andLawsdignity, and embodiedJudicial impartialityand the value of warmth.
Summary: Ying Yihong's case aroseSocialThe need for vigorous and warm enforcement is reflected in the extensive discussions. In this case,Department of JusticeIt was provided for Ying YihongLawsassistance, for him to obtain a just verdict. This illustratesJudiciaryIt plays a key role in the maintenance and protection of vulnerable groups. However, the presence of different perspectives also reminds us that inLawsThe principle of striking a balance between impartiality and severity in implementation is crucial. Only by taking into account different factors can we makeLawsOnly by embodying humanity and warmth can we truly conform to itSocialofFairness and justiceValues.