Recently, a celebrity show sparked a heated discussion.
During the catwalk, Zhu Yilong wore a knee-length short skirt, revealing his strong thighs, which caused a lot of controversy; And Bai Jingting, wearing a pair of bib pants and a formal suit, looked a little out of place. Bai Jingting and Song Joong Ki are wearing the same style, wearing a pair of white silkSocks and a pair of round scalp boots were even criticized as "kindergarten children's dress".
However, this controversy about appearance is not over yet, recently, South Korean actor Xu Guanghan shot a set of ** in a fashion magazine, which made the public begin to doubt his aesthetic level.
On this **, Xu Guanghan's upper body is a knitted shirt, but the lower body is a women's **, which looks very feminine.
He has also experimented with a variety of women's clothing, including high heels, black **, tight skirts, and more.
Xu Guanghan explained this, the reason why he did this is because he experienced the hardships of women's clothing, and he felt that now is an era suitable for both men and women, and clothing does not need to be deliberately distinguished between men and women.
However, this symbolism has been doubted by many because they are not tailor-made for Xu Guanghan, so they do not feel comfortable.
These performances, with the theme of "self-dedication", raised doubts about aesthetics, just like the previously hyped "Crazy Horse Show" and the footage of more ** female stars appearing in magazines.
In the entertainment industry, people pay more attention to their own connotations than those modeling and acting skills that do not match the public's aesthetics.
Some say it's an enlightened ethos, while others are skeptical.
Is it really better to convey one's opinion by catering to a certain aesthetic, culture or power with a non-mainstream aesthetic attitude?
People can't help but wonder if this act of "dying for art" is necessary.