**Ali's blood donation incident's aunt's identity was revealed, this time**bothered, several **group reports, this time should reassure everyone.
On December 6, The Paper released "Five Questions on the Truth of Ali's Blood Donation Incident, Restoring the Whole Process of Shanghai Woman's Car Accident Treatment", which became a hot topic.
A number of reporters from Shangguan News and The Paper, two companies under the Shanghai Poster Group, formed a joint interview group and interviewed the parties involved in the incident, including the injured Ms. Yu, her husband Mr. Tao, her parents, the Shanghai doctors who participated in Ms. Yu's rescue work, and the neighborhood committee where Ms. Yu's home is located.
The report sorted out the causes and consequences of the incident in detail, and it can be said that every detail was mentioned, especially for the places where everyone had doubts, and five questions were raised and special answers were given.
1.In the end, did "all public servants" be mobilized to donate blood?Who donated the blood?
2.Who is the "little aunt"?
3.What happened on the day Ms. Yu was injured?Why did Shanghai doctors intervene in the rescue process?
4.How was the decision to charter a flight made, and how was the money raised for the charter flight?What is the family background of the parties?Do you have any special connections?
5.**In the screenshot, why did Mr. Tao say to Ms. Yu, "Later, my little aunt contacted the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, and the Health Commission contacted Ali and mobilized all Ali's public servants to donate blood"?
There are specific people and specific things in the text, which can be said to restore the cause and effect of the incident.
From the report, the following important points can be noted:
My aunt, 60 years old, worked in a handicraft joint venture factory before retirement.
Ms. Yu: The injured person, 27 years old, is an assistant in the lobby of a bank branch in Shanghai, and a third-party labor dispatch worker.
Yu's father: Originally engaged in freight transportation, more than 30 years of driving experience, now a company in Fengxian as a shuttle driver.
Yu's mother: Worked in a science and technology listed company in Fengxian, Shanghai, financial work.
Mr. Tao: Ms. Yu's husband, 29 years old, from Henan, skateboarding coach.
Father Tao: In his 70s, he worked for a private factory in Fengxian before his retirement.
Tao Mu: Runs a small clothing store.
Regarding the chat record posted by Ms. Yu in **, Mr. Tao's explanation is that the original intention was to encourage his wife to be active**. Now he knows that he was wrong, and he is also blamed by his little aunt.
It's the first time that the identity of the little aunt has been explained in such detail, she is not a public official, she is just an ordinary worker, and she has no ability to reach the sky.
Ms. Yu is an outsourced employee of the bank and her income is not high. Her husband, Mr. Tao, is a coach and his income is not high, so he solves the problem of food and clothing. Newlyweds should not have much income.
Yu's father is indeed a driver, Yu's mother is in a listed company, and she should have the highest income in the family.
The Yu family has a suite, and the Tao family also has a suite. On the whole, the two Yu Tao families are not wealthy, at the lower middle level.
But this morning, there were only 140 comments on the article.
What I don't understand is who is deleting the comments and who can delete the comments.
Now the article likes 110,000, and there are more than 7,000 collections.
The article is indeed flawed, since it is a face-to-face interview, but there is no interview**, there is no evidence**, and only the questioned party is interviewed, how can it be proved that what they say is true and credible?
Do you believe that this is an emergency rescue full of positive energy?What do you think?