"Goldfinger" is not a simple cameo by Andy Lau, he is the core of the movie and dominates the entire story line. This Hong Kong-style two-man style film is unforgettable. Every detail in the picture is immersive, and the aftertaste is endless.
At 9 o'clock today, "Goldfinger" was officially released, and in just 4 hours, the box office exceeded 25.78 million, which is eye-catching. Although it is slightly inferior to the pre-sale hit "Twinkle Twinkle Twinkle Star", its performance has far exceeded many previous overly optimistic **.
What is remarkable is that Tony Leung and Andy Lau, two Hong Kong film superstars, have joined hands again, which is the second collaboration after 21 years of "Infernal Affairs". Although it may not be able to achieve the glory of the Academy Awards that year, the film will undoubtedly remain in the hearts of the public for a long time.
However, I was curious about the choice of Zhuang **, the screenwriter of "Infernal Affairs". How can he assemble such a first-class cast to make a film that is very different from the traditional police and bandit elements of Hong Kong films and is based on real events?What's even more surprising is that the film also incorporates elements of finance.
The Jianing case told in the movie, involving tens of billions of funds and many lives, hides a story about the era of greed, revealing a large-scale fraud incident that shocked everyone. The scale and impact of this case make people wonder how Zhuang ** skillfully integrated this real event into the film, combining it with elements of finance to form a unique film.
After watching the movie, I found the answer. This film is not just a story about justice and interest groups, but also a microcosm of an era. It shows how people of that era did not hesitate to take risks in the pursuit of wealth, and how they showed wisdom and courage in the game of chess.
What surprised me about Goldfinger is that it is not just a Hong Kong film in the traditional sense. It doesn't have an overly intense plot of fighting and killing, but it shows a scene of tense games between ordinary little people. This makes the movie present a different kind of Hong Kong flavor and is more deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.
The story prototype in the film is full of bizarre colors, the madness of capital, the treacherous business and the hands and eyes that finally take the rules of the game to the extreme, all make "Goldfinger" a visual feast. And some classic scenes in the film, such as Tony Leung and Andy Lau's game in the financial market, their choice between power and wealth, etc., are even more impressive.
However, what impressed me most about "Goldfinger" was the sense of contrast brought by time. The plot and background of the film are combined with reality, so that the audience can feel more deeply touched by the current social changes. In the process, I was not only immersed in the storyline, but also thinking about the social phenomena and human nature reflected in this film.
The two protagonists in the movie - Cheng Yiyan played by Tony Leung and ** played by Andy Lau - have experienced the polishing of time, from youth to the vicissitudes of life. Their faces, eyes, and hairlines have left traces of time, making people feel the ruthlessness of time and the impermanence of life. This sense of contrast is not only reflected in the characters, but also extends to the background and social changes presented in the whole film.
Goldfinger is not only a movie, but also a microcosm of an era. It takes the audience to explore the ruthless interpretation of human nature, desire, and time by showing the story of power struggles, changing times, and personal fate. The story begins with two protagonists as a guide, presenting two very different perspectives. As the plot develops, the audience gradually understands the stories and mental journeys behind each character, thus gaining a deeper understanding of the connotation and meaning of the entire story.
Overall, "Goldfinger" is a unique Hong Kong film masterpiece. It not only continues the classic style of Hong Kong films, but also innovates and breaks through in content and form. Through a well-polished plot, a stellar cast, and a compelling presentation, "Goldfinger" has managed to capture the audience's attention and earn word-of-mouth.
In the world of movies, every character, every story is unique. The same is true of the movie "Goldfinger", which brings us a deep and colorful picture, which makes people constantly feel the impact and surprise during the viewing process.
The role played by Cai Zhuoyan has gone from a girl who walked out of the rose garden of the juvenile detention center to a giant in the ** and real estate industry, with countless companies under her name, and she owns Jinshan Building. Her character's aura ranges from immature to graceful and luxurious, showing strong contrast and drama. Asa's acting skills are amazing, and the role she plays is not unwitting, but willingly used, and this complex psychological state is vividly expressed by her.
The ** hand played by Bai only became a key role in the movie. He pursues the role of Asa, but always reminds her to be vigilant. This woman knows the rules of the game well and has long understood the essence of being nothing more than a white glove. Shiro's character is full of wisdom and calmness, and his every movement and look is full of power.
Among the many supporting roles, Bai Zhi, Fang Zhongxin and Ren Dahua all performed quite steadily. However, what surprised me the most was Qian Jiale's outstanding performance. He plays Brother Rong as the only character with a grassroots flavor in the whole film. Although the overall atmosphere of the film is serious and dark, he is like a touch of red in the green bushes, injecting some smiles into the whole story. His every action and line is full of the breath of life, which makes people laugh out loud.
The plot structure of Goldfinger is refreshing. It is not a traditional Hong Kong-style police movie, but a movie with profound connotations. Two key action scenes in the film are impressive: the first is the opening scene, which depicts the clash between the Hong Kong police and the Independent Commission Against Corruption in 1977;Another scene is Liu Sir being attacked in the parking lot. These scenes are full of tension and excitement that makes the heart skip a beat.
However, "Goldfinger" is a visual feast. It vividly shows the rise of Cheng Yiyan, with extravagant scenes, glittering clubhouses, mountains of cash, buzzing markets, champagne, cigars, and modern dancing girls, all of which form an intoxicating picture. One of the scenes shows Andy taking dozens of people to Cheng Yiyan's home for inspection, and the scene of entering the building is shocking. These images are full of the breath and texture of life, making people feel as if they are in that era and scene.
Overall, Goldfinger is a movie worth watching. Although it is not a traditional Hong Kong-style police film, it has a unique charm and connotation. It transports the audience into a world full of drama and realism through a rich plot and visual effects. If you like movies with depth and substance, then Goldfinger will definitely not disappoint you.
Doubts are rife, but the film is remarkable for its unique narrative approach. The audience is engrossed in not missing a single detail, as the film constructs an intricate timeline through the flashbacks of the interrogators. Some viewers who were looking forward to the excitement of "Infernal Affairs" were shocked by this financial-themed blockbuster and found it difficult to invest for a while.
Prior to the film's release, there was a generally negative perception of its box office performance. After all, Andy Lau's cameo makes people worry about the lack of box office appeal. However, reality seems to shatter these doubts.
Although the box office performance of the film was not impressive, in the mainland market, it successfully won nearly 500 million box office. In the Hong Kong market, it has also shown a certain competitiveness, allowing producers to recoup their costs. Those worries seem to be unfounded.
The reunion of the two superstars, although it no longer has the grand occasion of the Hong Kong film era, but also maintains a decent posture. When watching the movie, I couldn't help but recall the glory days of those Hong Kong films.
At that time, every action of Cheng Yiyan and Jiawen Group was the vane of the world, bringing confidence to investors. Hong Kong's economy is booming, stock prices are rising, and Cheng Yiyan is also rising. He took advantage of the situation to issue **, the bank as collateral, the capital further expanded, and the stock price hit a new high.
Cheng Yiyan's success is not because of how great he is, but because he is at the right time and stands on the economic outlet. In contrast, Liu Qiyuan spent more than ten years to cross many countries and spent a lot of money to convict Cheng Yiyan. Is it worth it?
The era of Hong Kong films was once brilliant, and even if there were some mediocre works, they were still thriving on the whole. But even if Zhuang ** tried his best to gather top actors, the box office was only 500 million. Does this mean that there is a problem with the film itself?
Perhaps, the real question is whether young audiences are still interested in Hong Kong films?Do they understand the glory of the Hong Kong film era?Do you think that time is gone and no longer attractive?