Recently, a high-profile incident occurred in the Chinese chess world. Chess player Yan Chenglong was revoked of his championship title for defecating in a hotel bathtub, which caused widespread concern and controversy. Yan Chenglong issued a solemn statement through his newly registered Weibo account in response to the matter.
In the statement, Mr. Yan said that it was supposed to be an extremely private incident, and that he only asked the hotel's waiters to clean the bathtub according to the concept of good service. In addition, he also compensated the hotel with 100 yuan as compensation for resolving the matter. However, his privacy was leaked, and even more maliciously spread rumors that he "cheated on", which seriously violated his right to privacy and reputation.
The statement also mentioned that Yan Chenglong obtained 10The 50,000 yuan prize is a reward for years of study in the art of chess. However, the Chinese Chess Association violated the procedure in handling the matter, ignored the facts, and wrongly punished him. This violated not only his right to privacy and reputation, but also his right to property.
Regarding the punishment of the Chinese Chess Association, Yan Chenglong said that he did not accept it, and said that he had not received any feedback on the appeal. Faced with such a situation, he can only protect his rights and interests through legal means, and is determined to fight to the end. "If I don't sue them, they won't give me money," he said. The prize money is 105,000 yuan, and as long as they give me a bonus, I won't say anything more. ”
After Yan Chenglong's Weibo was released, it immediately attracted the attention of Jiupai News. We reached out to Yan Chenglong himself, who further expressed his dissatisfaction with the punishment imposed by the Chinese Chess Association and stressed that he would defend his rights and interests through legal means.
This incident has sparked widespread social concern and controversy. On the one hand, some people believe that the hotel excretion incident should be a private act, and the privacy of individuals should be respected, and the hotel only needs to deal with it appropriately. On the other hand, there has also been controversy over whether the punishment imposed by the Chess Association is too severe, with some questioning whether he should be stripped of his title.
In any case, this incident involves issues of personal privacy, reputation and property rights, which need to be properly resolved. We look forward to seeing the Chinese Chess Association take Yan Chenglong's complaint seriously and properly handle the matter in order to uphold the principles of fairness and respect for individual rights and interests in the chess world.
In this era of information, it is particularly important to protect personal privacy and rights. We call on all sectors of society to pay attention to this matter and jointly pay attention to and protect everyone's right to privacy and dignity.