The combat power of the Israeli army, placed on the Russian Ukrainian battlefield, is not even as go

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-29

Now in addition to the Russia-Ukraine war, the war in Gaza is also fierce, and we have been able to follow up on the fighting in two theaters at the same time.

Since they are all wars, then it is inevitable that there will be comparisons.

From the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian war to the present, we have followed up the whole process, during which whether it is the Russian army or the Ukrainian army, which side has a brilliant performance, will boast;Of course, whoever shows pulling his hips, he doesn't have to say anything unpleasant.

Because the Russian-Ukrainian war is actually deadlocked throughout most of time and space, the war is very uncomfortable, and there will be more complaints relatively speaking.

For example, the Russian army went from the beginning of the war to the rout in the autumn, and then to sit back and watch the passage of fighters, which is indeed staggering;And what the hell the Ukrainian army has become in this year's summer ** fight, naturally there is no need to say much.

Because there are too many complaints, everyone may think that the Russian and Ukrainian armies are very "vegetable", and even lament that in the 2020s, they fought an "ancient" war during World War I.

But one thing to say, not to mention the high-level decision-making of the Russian and Ukrainian armies, the combat effectiveness of these two armies is really not a vegetable. In particular, the more we look at the grassroots units, neither the will to fight nor the tenacity of that kind of battle have not been reduced in the slightest until now.

For example, we often ridicule the troops of the Western Military District of the Russian Army, but in fact, its "turnaround and running" with its crotch pulled is essentially a pot of high-level command, and it still has combat effectiveness when it runs over Izyum;As for the subsequent autumn rout and the subsequent immobility, this is not up to the grassroots combat units.

When it comes to the specific battle, the "young master soldier" of the Western Military District of the Russian Army did not say which unit was completely annihilated by the Ukrainian army, right?(Of course, those "big victories" in subspace are just happy on their own, and they are not within the scope of our normal people's analysis).

In addition to the troops of the Western Military Region, the troops of the Eastern Military Region are weaker in combat strength, but they also dare to fight ruthlessly, but their combat results are slightly worseHowever, because the command level was "willing" to use the troops of the Central and Southern Military Regions, and because they were also actively fighting, the results of the battle were relatively good.

In addition to the genuine Russian army, we all know about the fighting of Wagner, and the tenacity of the armed operations in the Donbass is also good.

You can often see some "false time and space" battle reports on the Internet saying that the Russian army is defeated every day, but how many prisoners has the Ukrainian army captured?

Looking at the Ukrainian army on the other hand, the performance of its grassroots units is, to be honest, more tenacious than the Russian army.

Because on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, the Russian army generally occupies an advantage in air artillery firepower, and its large-caliber artillery shells have always been several times that of the Ukrainian army. On the battlefield in Ukraine, the balance of artillery power can often be reflected in battle losses.

Just imagine the big ** of the Ukrainian army this summer, due to the disadvantage of the system strength and the blindness of the command, it has actually decided that it is impossible for it to make a strategic breakthrough.

However, the new brigade of the Ukrainian army, which has only been trained for a few months, dared to attack to the death, knowing that there was a large minefield and countless drones, shells, tanks, and infantry fighting vehicles in front of him, and he was about to rush.

Moreover, after kicking NATO tactics aside, it will be converted into infantry shock, of course, this is not simply the so-called "sea of people attack", but the most effective tactics that can be adopted on the basis of the strength of the existing system of the own side.

In the end, it was not because the troops did not contribute and the will to fight was not strong enough, but because of the balance of forces in the system.

Let's go and look at those battlefield images, the craters from large-caliber shells have been turned into the surface of the moon, and this place can still be foughtBut it's just gritting your teeth and fighting hard, this is not a bit hard, it really can't hold on.

Therefore, we can evaluate the Russian-Ukrainian war and point fingers at the commanders of both sides, but we really can't black the combat effectiveness of the two armies.

The so-called "dish" under the stalemate on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield is actually that the combat power of both sides is not weak, so that neither can defeat the other in one fell swoop.

If we look back at the fighting in Gaza, the warring parties are the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Hamas forces.

If the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield has formed a certain degree of stalemate and balance, then the Gaza battlefield will not have this balance of power, because the balance of strength between the two sides is too great.

Ukraine's side can withstand the offensive of the Russian army, on the surface, it seems to be small and big, but Ukraine is not absolutely small in the first place, with the assistance of the world's largest military bloc behind it, and people are stunned to be able to make more than 100 brigades to fight the Russian army, which has a basis for stalemate.

What about Gaza?It covers an area of 365 square kilometers, which is not as large as a countyAccording to Israel's estimates, the Hamas armed forces are only 30,000 at full capacity, and although other forces have names, their strength is not worth mentioning.

That's all there is to it, and that's all there is to it.

And then this land is still blocked by Israel's land, sea and air in all directions, and some resources have to rely on tunnels and smuggling, how much can this amount be?

Objective conditions determine that the strategic resources here in Gaza are too barren, and what the Hamas armed forces can really roll out is nothing more than Yasin rockets, which are placed on the battlefield of Russia and Ukraine, and even the Ukrainian army is not a bird.

Moreover, the environment in Gaza makes it impossible for Hamas to produce too many well-trained and elite soldiers, and its mobile force can fight in the thousands.

Israel, on the other hand, has an active force of 170,000 people, which is more than 500,000 when mobilizedAir Force, Navy, that's absolute superiority;On the army side, there are thousands of tanks and armored vehicles alone.

As soon as the ground battle began, 20 brigades smashed into Gaza.

On the battlefield in Ukraine, the Ukrainian army dared to rush the Russian army when it got 9 low-level NATO brigades with 9 universal cards;The military family is 20 truly standard Western-style brigades, going to smash a projectile of Gaza.

And since there is no air defense in Gaza, the Israeli Air Force can bomb at will, with the support of the United States, it does not need to care about the world, and there is no need to worry about the lack of ammunition.

How is this battle fought?

To be honest, the disparity in power is too great to fight.

As a result, against the background of being basically unable to fight, the Israeli army fought for a month and a half with a dignified army, and it was stunned that Gaza had not yet been eaten;I didn't even eat the northern half, and I still needed some airdrop supplies to fight in the south.

Are you funny?Just 5 kilometers in depth, you airdrop?Not to mention that after a month and a half of siege, he was able to give away the brigade seat of the country's number one ace brigade, the 1st Golani Brigade.

We all thought that the anti-Japanese drama was too exaggerated, look at the current war in Gaza, what "hand-torn tanks" have come out, and there is more than one case, the light infantry is just hitting the heavy troops in the face, how many vehicles are pasted?

Such a wonderful duel is too artistic, even too bizarre.

We often talk about the victory of the Palestinian armed forces on the Gaza side, why?

Is it really because Gaza was able to defeat Israel militarily in the end?Can you get to Tel Aviv?From a rational point of view, it really doesn't work.

There is no factual restraint in the international community, and as long as Israel grits its its teeth and bears it hard, it can win a superficial military victory at the earliest.

But if Israel can win, why talk about the Palestinians' victory?

Because in a battle with one enemy and one hundred, the criterion for real victory is not to destroy a hundred, as long as it is not ugly to lose, it has actually won;If you can play a little better along the way, it's a big win.

Therefore, this does not prevent us from talking about the victory of the Palestinian armed forces, and at the same time, it does not affect the dish of ridiculing the combat strength of the Israeli army.

Don't let you talk about the dishes?

Some people don't want people to say that Israeli cuisine is a military dish, but it is really a dish!

Moreover, this dish is a real combat strength dish, which can be transmitted from the command at the top to the grassroots troops, and is a reflection of the serious mismatch between combat power and resources at the military level.

If you don't understand this, just ask you:

If you take dozens of cavalry "family members", full of armor, firearms, knives and arrows, to surround a few "homeless" people who have no armor and only simple **, and you are still confused by the other party, do you think that even if you win in the end, can you be embarrassed to blow?

It's not a question of how big a face you have to be to blow it, it's a question of not having a face to blow it.

Not to mention the ugly record of the Pakistani armed forces in the real fight, it is very positive to capture and kill ordinary people and take the meritBut you have blown up all the United Nations staff, arrested ordinary people and risked merit and were recognized by people with specific identities, and even posed for photos to find the same few people to go back and forth several times, and even the superficial work is full of loopholes, what are you doing?

In the end, I still said that the current combat effectiveness of the Israeli army is to pick out the "selection of fronts", and it is not enough to lift shoes for any territorial defense brigade of the Ukrainian army;The Ukrainian army can't do a situation where a brigade of a few thousand people can send the brigade commander, battalion commander, and company commander away in a platoon-level contact battle.

Related Pages