The small print behind the students' grades is all A, and the parents said: There is a false appearance.
The student's final exam score is all A, and the small print on the back is exposed to the classification, parent: empty desk.
Exams, teachers' magic weapons, grades, students' life and death books"。Under today's education system, examinations have become an indispensable part of students' learning and life, and they are also a strict test of students' knowledge.
Whenever the final exams are approaching, parents are anxious and worried about their children's grades. Currently, the Ministry of Education is strict with student grades"Confidentiality", no longer announce specific results, which adds to the anxiety of parents.
If students' grades are not published, how can parents evaluate their children's learning?To address this issue, schools have adopted an alternative approach to evaluation, replacing specific classifications with ABCD grades. In this case, A represents the highest grade, which is the highest score, and the grades are in descending order.
This method of evaluation protects the privacy of students to a certain extent, and prevents them from being subjected to excessive psychological pressure due to unsatisfactory grades. However, parents do not fully approve of this approach, perhaps because they do not feel able to visualize their child's performance.
In the face of the adjustment of the education system, there seem to be some barriers to communication and understanding between parents, students and the education department. Perhaps more dialogue and communication will help to establish a more reasonable and transparent evaluation system, so that parents can feel more at ease and students can face the challenges of exams more calmly.
All students have an A in their final exams, but on the back of their report card, there is a line of small print showing their grades. Parents reacted to this:"False equivalence"。
In order to protect the self-esteem of students,"Students' test scores are not allowed to be made public, and they are not allowed to be graded privately"。The purpose of this policy is to reduce the comparison between parents and to allow students to stop in the learning process"Someone else's child"And anxiety.
What exactly does ABCDE mean when it comes to dividing grades?For students in grades 1 to 3, grade A is 95 or above, grade B is 85-94, grade C is 60-84, and grade D is 60-89.
For students in grades 4 to 6, A is at or above 90 points, B is 80-89 points, C is 60-79 points, and D is at or below 60 points.
Although this evaluation method was initially questioned by parents, under the current double reduction policy, the practice of not disclosing students' grades and grades has been understood to a certain extent. However, when parents see the back of the report card"Class PK"with"Pass rate"When the data is data, the mood cannot be calm for a long time, and some parents even say that this is not true.
Class PK"One column leads parents to believe that PK in the class is better than directly announcing students' grades. Parents believe that just because a student has a straight A's doesn't mean they have excellent grades, it will give them a false sense of superiority and even cause them to slow down in their studies later in life.
What's more, the small print on the back of the transcript can completely let parents know the classification and specific grades of their classmates, so this kind of superficial protection is actually meaningless.
In the past, students often cared about their academic performance and ranking in their class, which could lead to comparisons with other students. This may not be important for students with good academic performance, but it can be a psychological blow for students with lower grades.
The ultimate goal of abolishing the publication of grades and grading is to reduce the mental stress on students. Everyone is aware of their learning and can test their knowledge after each exam.
This practice has alleviated the phenomenon of involution in education to a large extent. Many parents often mention it"Someone else's child"This comparison is detrimental to one's own children. While parents may be motivated to motivate their children to improve, they inadvertently hurt their children's self-esteem.
At present, the problem of involution in education is becoming more and more serious. If parents continue to exert pressure through grades, it can be counterproductive to student learning. The elimination of the publication and assessment of scores will help create a more relaxed learning environment, allowing students to focus more on the accumulation of knowledge and personal growth.
In the context of the current test-oriented education, it can be said that the practice of concealing test scores and student rankings can be said to be a friendly approach, because students do not have to be under a lot of pressure. However, I don't think this approach is advisable.
ABCD can only provide students with an approximate score range, and in a large exam such as the high school entrance examination, a difference of one point may determine thousands of troops, especially the implementation of the high school entrance examination diversion policy, the importance of a difference of one point cannot be ignored.
In this case, many students may be unsure about their test scores. In the long run, this can lead to students neglecting their studies, and some students may even think that since they don't publish their grades, they don't need to worry, or even become lazy.
So, instead of doing ABCD-style grading, students and parents should be informed directly about their transcripts. This is a great opportunity for students to fill in the gaps and help ensure that they don't get lost in revision.
Finally, I would like to emphasize that although parents nowadays are eager to get good grades for their children, it is best to focus on their children's learning process and reduce their children's learning pressure. Excessive pursuit of grades can backfire.
The author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author supports any laws, rules, opinions, actions, and is not responsible for the authenticity of the information contained in this article. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising from the above content or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility.