Ukraine is at a critical juncture in the burning crisis in Europe, a victory or a defeat.
The Ukrainian side broke a first-class news, they proposed to mobilize another 45-500,000 troops, and vowed to fight to the death with Russia.
Zelensky's hesitation has attracted widespread attention from countries around the world.
This is not just a contest of force.
The contradictions between Zelensky and the army and the great difficulties faced by Ukraine, from personnel to finances, to the lack of **.
Whether Ukraine can find a way out of this life-and-death war is also a question of concern for the whole world.
How will Ukraine continue to write its own page in this dangerous competition?This is a time full of suspense.
The Ukrainian army sent another 45-500,000 troops to fight Russia, and the hesitation of Ukrainian ** Zelensky has attracted widespread attention at home and abroad.
In this dispute, Ukraine's top commander made public accusations against Zelensky, which also left Ukraine facing an important and difficult decision:
It is to strengthen the military to be fully prepared for the last battle, or to continue to withstand more pressure.
We all know that it is by no means easy to increase huge military spending, increase advanced military expenditures, and increase specialized military personnel.
However, this contribution is crucial for a country at the heart of the crisis that has been repeatedly invaded.
Already stretched, Zelensky is in a dilemma in the face of more and more reinforcements and growing economic pressure.
Zelenskyy is a leader who is well aware of his responsibilities and the expectations of the Ukrainian people.
In the face of such a major event related to the future of the entire Chinese country, Zelensky also hesitated.
First of all, strengthening the military will show the world that Ukraine is determined to do everything in its power to protect the security of its homeland;
On the other hand, the lack of resources, economic difficulties, and both external and internal pressures make it difficult and difficult to expand the army.
Indecisive and hesitant, this is not just Zelensky himself, he himself is also a leader.
In fact, it's more of a powerlessness to deal with the country's deep-seated problems.
This sense of powerlessness comes from the after-effects of the long-term war in Ukraine
Military power is weakened, the economy is destroyed, social instability, and political **.
The choices are therefore confusing: should we maintain a prudent diplomatic effort, or should we act firmly and decisively
Ukraine's leaders and policymakers are torn between continuing to deteriorate but facing greater danger and security at risk of loss.
Faced with such a dilemma, it is not easy to find a solution.
At this time, whether it is to draw bread to satisfy hunger or rely on external intervention, it is only a temporary solution.
Ukraine should base itself on its own country and intensify its efforts to transform itself at home to maximize its economic benefits.
However, in order to defend his country, the dignity of the country and the lives of its people, Zelensky needs to be held accountable for his decisions.
He must constantly weigh the interests of all parties in the turbulent flames of war and find a safe and bright way out.
The tug-of-war between Ukraine and Russia is intensifying, and more and more Ukrainian troops are being mobilized.
And Russia, on the other hand, is increasing its army in an orderly manner, which is an obvious advantage.
Ukraine's recruitment model is relatively simple, mainly based on recruitment, while Russia's recruitment forms are more diverse, including international mercenaries, contract soldiers, etc., all of which are mainly recruited. This gives Russia more troops**.
Due to the large number of personnel lost within Ukraine, Ukraine is even more lacking in strength in terms of the army.
Despite absorbing 20 million Ukrainians, it will not be easy to convince them to return home due to the current shortage of personnel in Europe.
Zelensky wanted to recruit Ukrainians from abroad, but he was faced with a difficult choice.
Europe's tolerance of Middle Eastern Muslims and black Africans has difficulties with white Ukrainian immigrants, leading to the increasing segregation of Ukraine.
The reason why Zelensky is hesitant is not that he does not want to expand the army, but that Ukraine is currently in a state of lack of supplies.
Now, 20 million troops in the US ** army have been mobilized, and if another 500,000 troops are added, then the ratio of conscription will reach 13 to 1.
If the elderly, children and women are counted, then only one in two to three young people in Ukraine is sent to the front to fight.
It's an act of draining the entire empire, and it's in danger of falling, if not letting it fall.
A robust military-industrial system is the key to modern warfare.
Ukraine can recruit a large number of fighters, but they lack modern ** and specialized fighters.
Despite the massive support provided by NATO, Ukraine's military power is rapidly depleting.
Russia, on the other hand, has built a completely autonomous military system, which has allowed it to have a powerful combat power in a short period of time.
Without the support of NATO, no matter how many soldiers Ukraine recruits, it will become a victim.
Zelensky's choice is not just a military issue, but the future fate of the entire country.
Due to resource constraints, can the increase in troops reverse the strategic disadvantage for Ukraine?
Under the premise of lack of first-class equipment, no matter how many troops are mobilized, it is difficult to form a modern army.
How Ukraine will respond to the crisis in the future and how its future will be determined is a highly controversial and uncertain question.