The ten marshals of the founding of the People's Republic of China formed a profound revolutionary friendship in the course of building new China, but it is undeniable that there will be some misunderstandings and entanglements between them to a greater or lesser extent, whether it is for reasons of character or the needs of revolutionary work. Among them, there have been three entanglements between Mr. Peng and Marshal ***.
The first entanglement between ** and *** occurred during the Red Army's fourth anti-encirclement and suppression period.
**Before that, he was an old revolutionary who participated in the Xinhai Revolution, the Northern Expedition and the Nanchang Uprising, and studied at the Higher Military Academy of the Soviet Union for 3 years, so he held important positions in the party after returning to China.
In the winter of 1931, ** officially entered the Soviet zone. After the Ningdu Conference the following year, ** was removed from the post of General Political Commissar of the 1st Red Army, Bogu became the de facto leader of the Soviet district, ** took the post of General Staff of the Red Army.
Shortly thereafter, a series of articles criticizing "guerrillaism" were published in the press, in which he held that guerrilla warfare was a narrow and conservative empirical tactic and that it was impossible to organize a regular war of a regiment on a large scale.
Since following Zhu Mao in the Jinggangshan period, he has had a relatively deep understanding of "guerrilla warfare" in the long-term revolutionary wars, and he very much agrees with this tactic that conforms to the current situation of the revolution.
After seeing ***'s article on guerrilla warfare, he said with great dissatisfaction: "If we had fought according to his words and fought hard with the Kuomintang, the Red Army's family would have been wiped out long ago."
Especially after the Red Army's attack on Nanfeng was frustrated in 1932, ** raised a lot of dissatisfaction with ***'s views, and these words also reached ***'s ears, but due to the tense situation at that time, the two did not find a suitable opportunity to exchange views and eliminate the estrangement between each other.
The second entanglement with *** occurred during the "Hundred Regiments War" during the Anti-Japanese War.
In 1940, the anti-Japanese situation was in a very severe stage, and the then deputy commander-in-chief of the Eighth Route Army ordered 6 regiments of the 129th Division to surround the Okazaki Brigade in Bajiayuan. Because the Okazaki brigade was the elite of the Japanese army and was well equipped, only more than 600 people repelled the attacks of our army many times, resulting in heavy losses for our army.
After learning of the battle situation, General Peng did not make major adjustments, but strictly ordered the 129th Division to continue the strong attack. After learning of this situation, the commander of the 29th Division at the time immediately called *** and said: "Mr. Peng, you can't fight like this, it's not worth attacking like this, I'll clean them up at night." ”
After hearing this, Mr. Peng shouted: "I can't wait, I must take it now." And the always elegant and gentle *** couldn't control his emotions after hearing this, and said loudly: "You are doing it brutally and being angry." After hearing this, Mr. Peng replied solemnly: "If I can't take it, I will withdraw the number of the 129th Division."
After that, our army made a summary report on the Battle of the Hundred Regiments, and criticized the Battle of the Hundred Regiments in the report, although it was not aimed at Mr. Peng, but the controversy about the Battle of the Hundred Regiments affected Mr. Peng's political career many years later.
The third entanglement between the two occurred after the founding of the People's Republic of China.
After the founding of the People's Republic of China, in order to promote the modernization and development of our country, we planned to build a modern military academy, and the "god of war", known as the "god of war", took over this important task and founded the Nanjing Military Academy in 1950.
After six years of development, the Nanjing Military Academy has achieved good results, and just when it was thriving, a gust of "anti-dogmatism" wind blew here.
In 1957, some people reported to the ** that the schoolwork of the Nanjing Military Academy was too tight, the examinations were too intense, and there was a tendency for the subordinates to shine the shoes of the superiors, and some people even directly named the young generals by adopting "revisionism" methods.
In February of the same year, a working group was formed to be stationed at the Nanjing Military Academy for inspection. In the end, the working group made the following summary to the Central Military Commission: "A big shortcoming in teaching is that the problem of dogmatism is quite serious, which is mainly manifested in the fact that the teaching content is not suited to the current reality of our army. ”
The following year, at a meeting of the Central Military Commission, ** said meaningfully: "It is very strange in the current school that the experience of the Chinese revolutionary war is not taught, but the 'ten major strikes' are emphasized." And *** also expressed his opinion on this, he said solemnly: "* has a very serious dogmatism, do not forget that during the period of the Red Army, dogmatism killed revolutionary comrades. ”
In July of the same year, ***, who was in his 60s and was ill, made a review at a meeting, and soon resigned from his relevant position and gradually faded out**.