Tensions between China and the Philippines over Second Thomas Shoal have risen again and become the focus of international attention. On December 10, the Philippines sent two coast guard vessels, a government vessel and a supply vessel to try to approach the Chinese beach** on Second Thomas Shoal. The Chinese Coast Guard fleet acted quickly and successfully prevented the approach of the Philippine vessel. This incident has once again exposed the complexity of the South China Sea issue and demonstrated China's firm stance on safeguarding its maritime rights and interests.
Strikingly, however, shortly after the Philippine ship was stopped, 29 countries openly supported the Philippine actions. The public statements by these countries may be motivated by concerns about China's growing influence in the South China Sea, and reflect the complex power play in international politics. China has responded firmly, making clear its determination to safeguard its rights and interests in the South China Sea in just a few words.
The reason why the Philippines dares to provoke on the Ren'ai Jiao issue may be related to the "US-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty" of the United States. Such provocative actions not only put pressure on China, but may also be aimed at depleting its resources in the South China Sea through friction with China. In addition, Marcos Marcos in the Philippines may also be in dire need of a tough stance to consolidate his political position because of domestic political struggles.
The abundant resources of the South China Sea are also an important reason for the Philippines' constant provocations. By encroaching on China's islands and reefs, the Philippines is trying to better exploit the oil and gas resources of the South China Sea. Against this backdrop, the Philippines has frequently provoked at Second Thomas Shoal in an attempt to exert pressure on China.
In this Dec. 10 incident, the Philippines again attempted to illegally enter Second Thomas Shoal, but was successfully stopped by China. In the face of its own provocative behavior, the Philippines has reversed black and white in the international community in an attempt to smear China. Less than 48 hours later, 29 countries openly supported the Philippines, an act that exposed the complex relationships and interests in international politics.
The statements of the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union on this incident are particularly striking. The U.S. stance on the South China Sea has long been controversial, and Britain's public statement shows that it is acting in tandem with the U.S. The EU's position is surprising, as it has taken a sudden turn on the issue of Second Thomas Shoal, despite reaching consensus with China on a number of issues.
China has made a resolute response to this, stressing that this is an issue between China and the Philippines and should be resolved through dialogue between the two sides. China also said that it does not accept the intervention of any third-party country and hopes to resolve differences through peaceful and friendly dialogue.
This incident once again proves China's firm position and independent foreign policy in the international arena. China resolutely opposes the intervention of external forces, demonstrating its determination to safeguard its territorial integrity and sovereignty. At the same time, China has also demonstrated its willingness to resolve the South China Sea issue through dialogue and negotiation, demonstrating its peaceful posture as a responsible major country. In short, the issue of Ren'ai Jiao is not only a bilateral issue between China and the Philippines, but also a microcosm of the international political power game. China's firm position and response strategy on this issue are not only a resolute safeguard of national sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also an adherence to international law and regional stability. In the face of the complex international political situation, China will continue to uphold the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, while resolutely safeguarding its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
In the process, China's diplomatic strategy has demonstrated respect for international rules and a commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes. China has made it clear that it will not compromise on the sovereignty and territorial issues in the South China Sea, and that it is willing to resolve the issue through peaceful dialogue, which reflects China's firm position and willingness to be peaceful as a responsible major country. While safeguarding its national interests, China has also demonstrated its deep consideration for international relations and regional stability.
At the same time, the Philippines' actions have exposed its internal and external political pressures and the complexity of its foreign relations. When dealing with the South China Sea dispute with China, the Philippines needs to balance not only domestic political struggles and public expectations, but also diplomatic relations with the United States and other Western countries. This series of factors has caused the Philippines to vacillate its policy on the South China Sea issue, sometimes hard-lined, sometimes seeking reconciliation.
On the other hand, the positions of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union reflect their strategic considerations in international politics. By supporting the Philippines, these Western countries are trying to counterbalance China's influence in the South China Sea, while also consolidating their own geopolitical interests through these actions. This series of actions reveals the power game and the complexity of diplomatic relations in international politics. To sum up, China's firm stance on the Ren'ai Jiao issue and its willingness to peacefully resolve disputes are important manifestations of its foreign policy. In the face of the complex situation in the international community, China will continue to uphold its principles while actively seeking ways to resolve disputes peacefully. The Philippines and other countries involved in the South China Sea also need to carefully consider the consequences of their actions and avoid making decisions that undermine regional stability for short-term gains. Only through dialogue and cooperation can we ensure peace and stability in the South China Sea and create favorable conditions for the long-term development of the region.