On the afternoon of May 4, the ** Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission announced that Zhu Congjiu, a member of the party group and vice chairman of the Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, is suspected of serious violations of discipline and law, and is currently undergoing disciplinary review and supervision investigation by the ** Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission.
The young and promising Zhu Congjiu was 47 years old when he was transferred to the vice governor of Zhejiang in May 2012, and he has worked in this position for 10 years, becoming the longest-serving vice governor of finance, but he has never been able to go further in his career. In July last year, Zhu Congjiu ceased to be vice governor and became a member of the party group of the Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, and was elected vice chairman of the Zhejiang Provincial Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in January this year.
It is reported that the reason why Zhu Congjiu failed to "go further" is mainly because his family is too wealthy. According to sources, Zhu Congjiu has been a publicly "rich man" among the senior cadres of the China Securities Regulatory Commission and Zhejiang Province for many years, and he has declared hundreds of millions of assets to the organization, and has even been jokingly called "Zhu billion" in local rumors.
The nickname in the market often becomes a legend. For example, Wang arranged for a person to receive 100,000 yuan, and he was nicknamed Wang 100,000. Such a joking can inadvertently affect a person's image. And Zhu Congjiu was nicknamed Zhu Yiyuan, perhaps it was because of this nickname that he was eventually investigated and punished.
But we might as well change the angle and take a look at what this "Zhu billion" means. In other words, how big is a billion yuan?
According to statistics, the volume of 100 million yuan is about 119 cubic meters. Zhu Congjiu's 1 billion yuan is equivalent to 118 cubic meters, enough to fill a container. A single 100,000 yuan banknote with a thickness of about 1 centimeter is stacked with a thickness of about 100 million yuan, and 100 million yuan is 100 meters high, which is equivalent to the height of a 30-story building. Zhu Congjiu's 1 billion yuan is as high as 1,000 meters. Climbing a 1,000-metre-high staircase every day is a challenging sport.
Let's calculate again, for a hundred yuan a piece, 100 million yuan is a million yuan. Count one card a second, 3,600 seconds an hour, and you can count 3,600 sheets. In 24 hours a day, you can only count 76,400 photos. 100 million yuan a piece, it takes 277 to count it78 hours, that is, 24 hours without food or sleep, is counted as 115 days. According to the 8-hour work system, after counting 100 million yuan, it takes 345 working days. Zhu Congjiu's 1 billion yuan counts for 8 hours a day, and it takes 345 days to count.
This undoubtedly makes people feel distressed about Zhu Congjiu's wealth. 8 hours a day, 345 days, repeating a single action, how boring!Behind this figure is the scrutiny and investigation that a man who once excelled in politics now faces. In this process, the legend of "Zhu Yiyi" may become an indelible history.
Zhu Congjiu's case has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions, and people have commented on this ** who once held important positions in politics and he was jokingly called "Zhu billion". Behind this series of figures and details, not only reflects Zhu Congjiu's huge wealth, but also triggers a deep reflection on the abuse of power and corruption.
First of all, Zhu Congjiu's failure to go further because he was "rich" caused society to think about the relationship between wealth and political power. In the eyes of some, whether the wealth of ** can be used as a criterion for evaluating their political performance and ability is a highly controversial topic. On the one hand, some people believe that Zhu Congjiu may have encountered a bottleneck in political promotion because of his relatively strong personal family wealth. On the other hand, there are also questions about whether such wealth is legitimately acquired and whether corruption is involved. This makes the society's call for the transparency of property disclosure stronger.
Secondly, the article vividly depicts "Zhu Yiyuan", and shows the huge volume of this huge number in reality through the metaphor of numbers and images. Such a description not only gives readers a more intuitive understanding of Zhu Congjiu's wealth, but also arouses thinking about the social problem of uneven distribution of wealth. Zhu Congjiu's 1 billion yuan is enough to fill a shipping container, which reminds people of the injustice of the gap between the rich and the poor in society, and raises concerns about social fairness and justice.
Finally, the article successfully resonated with readers by calculating and depicting the huge amount of wealth, as well as an in-depth analysis of Zhu Congjiu's personal situation. While the reader thinks about the story behind the numbers, he is also concerned about social issues and political ethics. Such comments are instructive, leading people to think deeply about the problems existing in contemporary society, and calling for more attention and reform.
In general, the heated discussion caused by Zhu Congjiu's case is not only a pursuit of responsibility, but also a reflection on the entire social system and morality. By deeply analyzing the numbers and images, we can see more clearly the problems that exist in reality, and then promote the reform and progress of society in terms of fairness, justice, and the fight against corruption.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!