Recently, a news about Zhao Lusi's defeat has attracted widespread attention. Lawyer Zhao Lusi Fang posted a response on social **, saying that Zhao Lusi had started the appeal process, and emphasized that the first-instance judgment has not yet taken legal effect. In this context, this article will explain the causes and consequences of the incident in detail, and analyze Zhao Lusifang's response and the impact of the legal judgment.
It is understood that the dispute originated from a text revelation published by a netizen on social **. The netizen mentioned some of Zhao Lusi's suspected behaviors at the magazine shooting site in the article, but did not directly mention Zhao Lusi's name, but used some words to refer to it. However, this breaking news article triggered a strong reaction from Zhao Lusi, believing that the netizen's behavior violated Zhao Lusi's right to reputation.
Zhao Lusi sued the netizen for infringement of the right to reputation, and put forward all the claims in the trial. However, the court held that the defendant's text was a common topic comment in the entertainment industry and should not be treated as a defamation infringement. Therefore, the court rejected all of Zhao Lusi's claims.
Regarding this verdict, Zhao Lusi said that he had appealed and entrusted a law firm to start the appeal process. At the same time, lawyer Zhao Lusifang also posted a response on social **, emphasizing that the first-instance judgment has not yet taken legal effect, and calling on the public not to over-interpret the content of the first-instance judgment before the final judgment is made.
Regarding Zhao Lusi's response and the impact of the legal judgment, some analysts believe that although the first-instance judgment did not support Zhao Lusifang's claim, this does not mean that Zhao Lusi does not have reputation problems. At the same time, legal experts also pointed out that although the defendant's text is a common topic comment behavior in the entertainment industry, it does not mean that this kind of behavior can infringe on the reputation rights of others at will. Therefore, there is a need to be more cautious and fair when dealing with such disputes.
In short, Zhao Lusi's defeat has aroused widespread attention and discussion. Although the first-instance judgment did not support Zhao Lusifang's litigation claim, this incident still reminds us to pay more attention to the legality and reasonableness of words and deeds in the era of social **. At the same time, it is also hoped that the public can think rationally and analyze such events, and not over-interpret or exaggerate emotions.