Normal countries aspire to stable and peaceful development, but surprisingly, four wars broke out in just one day. More than 30 countries have already been involved. Among them, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the Middle East is heating up, and the United States has also joined the war and bombed Syria. At the same time, the conflict on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield continues. In addition, armed conflict has also begun in the Asian region with the Kokang Allied Forces in northern Myanmar.
Many netizens are worried that if tensions on the Korean Peninsula escalate again and friction between the United States and South Korea and North Korea erupts again, the Kosovo region may also be in danger. These circumstances have raised many fears about World War III. After all, the United States is always clamoring for war, and Japan follows the United States with the ambition of starting a war. These factors are a source of instability for the international community. In recent years, the instigation and influence of the United States and other hegemonic countries have led to the international situation being in a state of turmoil.
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been going on for two years, and although Ukraine is supported by the 30 NATO countries, the war continues, and Ukraine has become a mess. However, the point of this war is not on Ukraine, but on the use of Ukraine by the United States as its war leader. In fact, Russia has shown great strength in single-handedly taking on the 30 NATO countries, and has been fighting against each other on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield for two years.
These countries have openly or covertly sent troops to infiltrate and reach the battlefield in Ukraine, and various armaments** have also been continuously sent to Ukraine, which has put tremendous pressure on Russia, and even paid the price of hundreds of thousands of war losses. Despite the difficulties faced by financial blockades, inflation and shutdowns, Russia has been able to mobilize its armaments and combat power and insist on competing with the thirty countries behind Ukraine. This conflict once again demonstrated the perseverance and determination of the fighting people of Russia.
Ukraine's accession to NATO has been opposed by Russia, and NATO has expanded eastward on Russia's doorstep to support Ukraine, but Ukraine has not yet been able to become a full member due to Russia's serious opposition. However, the thirty NATO member states have provided Ukraine with **, military aid, money and material support, but at the same time, these countries have not really joined the frontal battle of the Ukrainian conflict, but are like cheerleaders to create ** and atmosphere on the side. Therefore, despite the support that these countries have provided to Ukraine, they have not been involved in the war.
Even if European countries provide Ukraine with **, they will not dare to confront Russia head-on, because the consequences of provoking discontent in Russia, a fighting nation, will be very terrible. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that these countries are currently drawn into the war. If the United States continues to intensify the contradictions and push the conflict in Ukraine worsening, Ukraine's strength may not be able to bear it, and in the end it can only be resolved by the United States and many NATO countries themselves.
However, this is very unlikely, as it will leave Western countries with no way back. On the contrary, the possibility of extreme measures by Russia is very high. Under such circumstances, no country should act rashly, otherwise it will arouse the anxiety and opposition of the international community. Although the international situation is a dynamic and delicate one, it is certain that no country can easily judge whether these destabilizing factors will lead to the outbreak of World War III.
However, for the United States, there are multiple problems on its own soil that cannot be easily ignored. Before brazenly starting World War III, the United States should also think carefully about what it is pursuing, what it expects to gain, and what it must pay. Is there a possibility that it is not suitable and not cost-effective?Therefore, while there is a theory of the outbreak of a large-scale Third World War, in practice many countries will carefully consider and act cautiously.
For example, if the United States can maintain a rational and objective view of the international situation, it will be able to provide a good guarantee for the stability of the situation.