The first China International ** Chain Promotion Expo was held in Beijing, which attracted global attention. Initially, foreign countries were not optimistic about this, believing that this was just China's efforts to save the transfer of the ** chain. However, U.S. businesses have shown a lot of interest in it, exceeding previous expectations. Among the 515 domestic and foreign enterprises and institutions participating in the exhibition, American exhibitors accounted for 25%, including well-known companies such as Mobil, Apple, Tesla, Intel, and Qualcomm. These companies have shown a strong interest in participating in China's first-chain cooperation, even in the face of pressure and warnings from Biden. This phenomenon not only surprised Biden, but also made the White House unhappy.
However, American companies are trying to expand their business with China, which is bound to cause displeasure in Biden**. In fact, the day before the opening of the Chain Expo, Biden announced the creation of the White House version of the "Chain Resilience Committee", which aims to strengthen the regulation of the U.S. economy and the most important chain. The committee's mandate includes monitoring the investment of U.S. companies, especially the flow of funds from "sensitive companies", while promoting the de-dependency of the ** chain, reducing the dependence on other countries in unfavorable areas, and providing early warning to the ** chain of US semiconductors. In announcing the move, Biden confidently said it would be the starting point for the United States to win the competition in the 21st century.
The analysis points out that the establishment of the ** Chain Resilience Committee by the United States is a response to China's expansion of ** chain cooperation, and its purpose is to discourage American companies from investing in China. Biden has not hidden this intention. However, the United States has now developed a strange perception: while the U.S. Department of Commerce encourages U.S. companies to invest around the world and increase the competitiveness of their products, it restricts investment in China. Considering the vitality of the Chinese market, the level of consumption and the strength of the upstream chain, American companies continue to invest in China for their own interests, and at the same time, they also express their interest in participating in cooperation with China to Biden "unhappy".
In addition, the British media pointed out in a commentary that the implementation of the diversified chain by American companies does not completely exclude China, and to a certain extent, it only allows more Asian companies to become "intermediaries" between the United States and China. The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework they advocate is still a long way from success, and even if it succeeds, it may not be able to eliminate dependence on China. Some commentators believe that "imitating China does not work", and the United States has raised interest rates many times in order to maintain the hegemony of the US dollar and refuses to reduce the exchange rate, so the real industry cannot achieve a cost advantage;In other words, as long as U.S. companies carry out proliferation and transfer, China is an unavoidable link.
Through the analysis of the first **Chain Expo held in China and the reaction of the United States to it, we can see that the **chain plays an important role in the global economy. By holding the expo, China has demonstrated its strength in the field of ** chain and attracted the attention and participation of many international enterprises. At the same time, the United States has promoted the establishment of the **Chain Resilience Committee to resist the expansion of American companies' investment in China. This kind of game and confrontation reflects the complexity of the current geopolitical and economic competition.
In my opinion, the importance of the ** chain cannot be ignored. It involves the development of the national economy and the guarantee of the country's economy, and also affects the competitiveness and sustainable development of enterprises. Both China and the United States are working hard to strengthen their own first-chain capabilities, and improve the resilience and competitiveness of the first-chain by increasing partners and optimizing resource allocation. However, in a globalized economic environment, unilateral protectionist measures cannot bring long-term benefits, and only through openness, cooperation and innovation can the optimization and coordinated development of the ** chain be realized.
Finally, I think that in the field of ** chain, China's position and influence will become more and more important. The size and vitality of the Chinese market, consumer demand, and the development of the industrial chain will all be key factors that will attract international companies. At the same time, China is also actively promoting the innovation and upgrading of the first chain, strengthening cooperation with other countries, and jointly building a global first chain network. As a self-editor, I will continue to follow and report on the dynamics of the chain field, and strive to provide readers with valuable information and perspectives.