In recent years, Toshiba and Alstom, two companies that once dominated the global market, have failed in the face of sanctions, but Huawei has been able to stand up tenaciously. So, what exactly is the reason for this very different result?This article will analyze it from multiple perspectives.
Sanctions are a common means in the international market, which can restrict and suppress specific countries or enterprises. In this context, Toshiba, Alstom and Huawei have embarked on different paths of destiny. While they all face similar dilemmas, they have had very different results.
Toshiba and Alstom were once leaders in their industries, but they face enormous challenges under the impact of sanctions. First, Toshiba and Alstom lack an effective response when faced with sanctions. They did not adjust their strategies in a timely manner and did not adapt to changes in market demand. At the same time, their predicament is exacerbated by irrational management systems and inefficient organizational structures.
Second, Toshiba and Alstom are relatively lagging behind in technological innovation and R&D capabilities. While they have achieved some in the past, they have stagnated and failed to keep up with the industry's trends. At the same time, they also face problems such as intellectual property protection and market access, which make the impact of sanctions even more unbearable.
On top of that, Toshiba and Alstom have huge limitations in responding to changes in the international political environment. They have not been able to cooperate effectively with **, industry organizations and other countries, and have lost the opportunity to fight for benefits at critical moments.
In contrast, Huawei's ability to stand tall despite the same sanctions has several key factors.
First of all, Huawei has strong technical capabilities and R&D capabilities. With continuous technological innovation and investment, Huawei has made major breakthroughs in 5G and artificial intelligence, leading the development of the industry. This allows Huawei to provide high-quality products and services and remain competitive in the face of sanctions.
Second, Huawei focuses on its internationalization strategy and has established a global business layout. It has established a strong ecosystem with a wide range of partnerships with partners across the globe. This global business model enables Huawei to flexibly respond to changes in the international situation and mitigate the impact of sanctions.
In addition, Huawei has demonstrated excellent resilience in dealing with political risks. It actively conducts dialogue and cooperation with national and industry organizations to solve existing problems and strive for more development opportunities. Huawei's openness and transparency have also won international recognition and strengthened its competitiveness in the global market.
In summary, Toshiba and Alstom failed to adapt to market changes in the face of sanctions, lacked effective management and technological innovation, and were unable to establish good cooperative relations with ** and industry organizations. On the contrary, Huawei has succeeded under sanctions thanks to its technological prowess, internationalization strategy, and ability to respond to political risks. This shows that in the context of globalization, companies need to be innovative and adaptable, and actively seek multi-party cooperation to emerge from the difficulties in the face of sanctions.
Sanctions are not the end, but an opportunity. Toshiba and Alstom failed to capitalize on this opportunity, while Huawei proved its worth with perseverance. Only by constantly adapting to change, being brave in innovation, and working with all parties at the same time can companies rise to the occasion in the face of adversity and show their true strength in the global marketplace.