In the Later Tang Zhuangzong and Mingzong dynasties, the struggle for power became an intricate game of power schemes. Through means such as dividing towns, eunuchs supervising the army, and sending people to parachute into Lulong, the Later Tang Dynasty court gradually dismembered Zhao Dejun's real power. During the Zhuangzong period, although Zhao Dejun guarded Youzhou, he was empty for a long time and his strength was limited. The difference is that Shi Jingjiao has shown outstanding leadership skills in the struggle for power and wits, attracting the support of many confidants and die-hard friends.
Power game: Zhao Dejun's real power is gradually lost.
In the Zhuangzong and Mingzong dynasties, Zhao Dejun was only the empty defender of Youzhou for a long time, and his strength was not significant enough. The Later Tang Dynasty court adopted strategies such as dividing towns and eunuchs supervising the army, dividing Zhao Dejun's military power, and sending people to parachute Lu Long to serve as the assassin of each state, which weakened Zhao Dejun's influence. Especially in Lu Longya's army, Zhao Dejun's tooth general Wu Congjian became a general in Hedong, and was skillfully placed in Lu Long's interior, which exacerbated Zhao Dejun's isolation.
Scheming: The foundation of Shi Jingjiao's rule.
In contrast, Shi Jingjiao showed excellent ruling talents. At the critical juncture of Fan Yanguang, Zhang Congbin and other rebellions, Shi Jingjiao skillfully won the support of Song Yanhao, the concubine of Tang Zhuangzong, and Lu Shunmi, the rebel general of Later Liang. These two were not Shi Jingjiao's old subordinates, but they died for him at a critical moment, demonstrating his leadership position in the army. Shi Jingjiao skillfully won the hearts of the people, in contrast, Zhao Dejun lost the control of the Youzhou army in the Battle of Tuangu.
Leadership style: Shi Jingjiao's talent recruitment.
When Shi Jingjiao was guarding Hedong, he successfully gathered a large number of talents through careful management. For example, he received the support of Li Jizhong against the legacy of Li Sizhao and his wife, and successfully won over Fu Yanneng, who was dismissed by Li Conghou. Even after the establishment of the Later Jin Dynasty, Shi Jingjiao was able to re-promote some of the old Zhuangzong and Later Liang generals, such as Wang Jing and Lu Shunmi, forming a diversified ruling base. In stark contrast, Zhao Dejun's management ability is obviously insufficient, and the Youzhou soldiers have left one after another, and even his cronies cannot be retained.
Leadership charisma: Shi Jingjiao is better than Zhao Dejun.
In terms of leadership style, Shi Jingjiao's charm obviously surpasses that of Zhao Dejun. Although Zhao Dejun reigned for a long time, he was among the top five envoys of Youzhou before Lu Long was ceded, but as a local, he failed to win the trust of the Youzhou army. On the contrary, although Shi Jingjiao was not a native, he succeeded in establishing a strong ruling foundation and winning the support of the army and generals through his outstanding ruling talents and talent recruitment.
Scheming: Outwitting over force.
To sum up, in the power contest in the post-Tang Dynasty, Shi Jingjiao successfully defeated Zhao Dejun with his excellent ruling skills and talent recruitment. Shi Jingjiao's resourcefulness trumped force, and his leadership style and charisma made him stand out in the political struggle, and ultimately won the power struggle in the Later Tang Dynasty.
In this article, the author analyzes in detail the power struggle between the Zhuangzong and Mingzong dynasties in the post-Tang Dynasty, between Zhao Dejun and Shi Jingjiao. By describing the actions of the two generals, their ruling styles, and their relationships with their subordinates, the article shows Shi Jingjiao's outstanding performance in the political struggle, while Zhao Dejun is inadequate.
First of all, the article emphasizes a series of measures adopted by the Later Tang court, such as dividing towns, eunuchs supervising the army, and parachuting Lu Long, to weaken Zhao Dejun's real power. This policy led to Zhao Dejun's long-term empty stay in Youzhou, with limited strength. In contrast, Shi Jingjiao established a strong ruling foundation by recruiting talents and enlisting support. This difference in political skill made the two generals show very different faces in the power struggle.
Secondly, the article highlights the situation that after the Battle of Tuangu, Zhao Dejun's control over the Youzhou army was low. By depicting the scattered Youzhou army led by Zhao Dejun's cronies, the author highlights Zhao Dejun's failure to effectively command his subordinates in times of crisis. Comparatively speaking, Shi Jingjiao successfully secured key support at a critical juncture, demonstrating his outstanding leadership skills.
In addition, the article provides a detailed analysis of Shi Jingjiao's leadership style and talent recruitment. During his reign in Hedong, Shi Jingjiao established an eclectic ruling foundation by skillfully gathering talents. In contrast, Zhao Dejun's management ability is obviously inferior to Shi Jingjiao, and the Youzhou soldiers have left one after another, and the situation is not good.
Finally, the article highlights Shi's strengths in resourcefulness and leadership charisma. Shi Jingjun surpassed Zhao Dejun through clever strategy, and his leadership style and correct use of talent made him stand out in the political struggle. This was reflected in the later rebellions of Fan Yanguang and Zhang Congbin, and he successfully won important support.
Overall, this article vividly shows the political differences between Zhao Dejun and Shi Jingjiao through an in-depth analysis of the power struggle in the post-Tang period. The author's analysis is detailed and logical, which enables readers to have a deeper understanding of the political landscape and the leadership style of the two generals at that time.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!