The "double reduction" policy has been implemented for more than two years. The policy aims to combat the negative impact of off-campus training institutions on education and reduce the extracurricular burden of students. However, the actual implementation process has been more complex than expected, and there has been some confusion everywhere that has fallen far short of our expectations.
After-school services have completely turned sour, and the burden on students has become even heavier. At present, the "double reduction" policy has not been implemented as expected in most parts of the country, especially in economically and socially backward places. After-school services in junior high schools are almost entirely occupied by additional extra classes, resulting in an increase in students' daily school hours by nearly two hours. In the past, students in the first and second years of junior high school in many places were usually not required to take additional extra classes, but now this has changed and the extra classes have become legal and the fees are legalized. This completely ignores the original intent of the "double reduction" policy. The competition between schools for additional classes has created a new "theater effect", and the student load in school is higher than in the past.
After-school services have changed from voluntary to compulsory, and the "adaptations" and distortions of the "double reduction" in various localities have given students a vivid education of "reverse ideology and morality". **The notice on the "double reduction" clearly states that after-school services should follow the principle of voluntary, and clearly states that lectures and teaching are not allowed. However, in practice, voluntariness has become compulsory or disguised compulsion, and schools have used the "double reduction" policy to increase the burden on students, which has had an obvious negative impact on the majority of students.
It exposes the chaos of teacher management. Teachers' private fees for make-up lessons are a persistent problem in the education system and one of the most criticized aspects of teachers. We can't say for sure whether the "double reduction" policy has led to the further development of the phenomenon of teachers making up lessons privately, but in any case, it cannot be said that the cost and burden on students have decreased. The reality is that students and parents alike know this.
Large training institutions such as New Oriental and Xueersi have been defeated, but small underground training institutions have survived tenaciously and their number has been increasing. The return of junior high and high school students from our local area to the capital every winter and summer vacation can clearly predict the popularity of subject training in society, and it can be seen that the number of student training during winter and summer vacations, as well as Saturdays and Sundays, has not decreased.
The educational anxiety of the masses in the educationally and culturally backward areas has increased unabated. In educationally backward areas, the masses generally regard off-campus Xi as an important way to improve the results of the high school entrance examination and college entrance examination. However, the implementation of the "double reduction" policy has had varying degrees of impact on social training, resulting in more worries about the quality of teaching and the results of the high school and college entrance examinations. In many places, after the "double reduction" policy, a large number of students flocked to educationally developed areas to study, which exacerbated the problem of student outflow.
The cost of off-campus training has increased significantly, which has greatly increased the financial burden on families.
The chaotic situation in the implementation of the above-mentioned "double reduction" policy has seriously weakened the seriousness and authority of the policy. This has highlighted the contradictions existing in China's primary and secondary education, seriously damaged the dignity of education, and ruthlessly uncovered the scandal in the education circles.
The actual implementation of the "double reduction" policy is disappointing and contrary to the original intention of the policy. In fact, this reflects the contradiction accumulated over a long period of time in education across the country, is a manifestation of unbalanced educational development, and is also the result of the scarcity of high-quality education in society. At the same time, it is also an inevitable product of China's unique test-oriented education tradition and the intensification of competition in the market economy. Therefore, although the "double reduction" policy may have good motives and goals, it lacks the support of the broad masses. Since the policy cannot convince the masses well, the effect of its implementation can be imagined.
There are differences in the level of economic and social development and education in various parts of China, especially the gap between urban and rural areas. Therefore, the implementation of the "double reduction" policy with unified standards and models will inevitably lead to different effects. Since the reform and opening up, many county-level schools, especially junior and senior high schools in poor areas, have gradually declined. On the contrary, in some places, social training has alleviated educational anxiety. Therefore, it would be unwise and unrealistic to generalize to restrict out-of-school training. The justification of reducing the anxiety of out-of-school training and increasing the burden on schools is despicable.
The issue of education is never isolated, it is the result of the interweaving of various contradictions in society. Some problems can only be solved gradually with the development of society. One of the most fundamental is to continue to increase investment in education, all levels should take practical measures to pay attention to education as much as paying attention to economic development, especially in the construction of the teaching team, without high-level teachers, the burden on students can never be reduced. AI assistant creation season