Recently, a number of ** in the United States jointly issued a statement, the main content of which is that on American social **, 4,800 suspected "fake accounts from China" were found, these accounts disguised as Americans, and then released some news to incite American politics**, trying to "interfere" in the United States' next year's *** At first glance, it seems that "there is a nose and eyes", but the next "evidence" of the United States ** makes Xiao Tie laugh. According to the Associated Press: These accounts do not publish false news, but share content posted by politicians, **, etc. on American social networking platforms.
Freedom of speech in the United States?So the whole thing is actually quite simple, about 4,800 accounts shared "different statements" from different politicians from different parties in the United States. According to the U.S. side, these accounts will select different information from American liberals and conservatives, and their purpose is not to support any party, but to exaggerate the party ** and further incite extremism. To put it simply, Americans think: some people ** the words of some politicians, so this is inciting "extremism" and putting different parties in the United States into a state of **. Personally, I think: they just repeated the words of American politicians, so it should be American politicians who "instigated **", right?
The freedom of the United States is first and foremost an internal problem in the United States, and it must be blamed on the "people". Judging from the news released by the United States, the so-called "opposing remarks" actually come from American politicians, and these accounts have not been tampered with or maliciously edited when they were released, so the problem is not with the people. Personally, I guess that there may be strong partisanship in the United States, so in order to "divert attention", I blame "American netizens" for this issue. It is equivalent to the United States wanting to cover up the "domestic scandal" and casually finding a scapegoat, and the result is now known to everyone.
Behind the data of the United States, the second is that the United States mentions "suspected of coming from China", that is to say, the United States itself is not sure, so it is reasonable to suspect that the United States is "slandering China". Personally, I guess that the United States may want this "scapegoat" to look more like, so it has put on a coat of "suspected from China". In a way, this accusation is indeed "perfect", because it is impossible to tell whether these accounts are American or Chinese, but the overall look is a farce, which may be the most failed public relations in the United States in recent years.
The 4,800 accounts of the U.S. Capitol Hill incident** American politicians remarked, instead of asking those "politicians" who talk nonsense, but asking the people to shut upSecondly, if an account is speaking on different parties, there is indeed a suspicion of incitement, the key is 4,800 accounts, which means that these accounts themselves belong to different "parties", and the remarks of the party politicians they support are also wrong?As for interfering in the United States, this is even more nonsense, the people can't even say their own "true words", how can they interfere?
Wen Xiaotie).