Since ancient times, the battle between offense and defense has been the norm, and the role of defense facilities is crucial. As a line of defense, the city is performing offensive and defensive battles, both ancient and modern. This article will analyze the power of the era of cold weapons and hot weapons, and analyze the different manifestations of defensive capabilities and street warfare in the two eras.
Defense: Deepening and fortressing of cities.
The advantage of the city's topography lies in its defensive depth, which forms a natural defensive facility. From the ancient Shanhaiguan Pass, Jiayuguan Pass to Constantinople, the topographic maps and city defense maps of the city show that the defending side used the terrain to build passes, fortresses and fortresses to form a defense system in depth. Even in modern times, the city is still a central defensive fortress, and a natural defense structure is constructed through the rational layout of a large number of above-ground buildings and underground buildings.
Attack problems: blind spots, blind spots, and communication problems.
However, the attackers will encounter problems with fire blind spots, blind spots, and poor communication when confronted with these defenses. As the attack dragged on and declined, the defender's counterattack force participated, and the attacker's defeat was almost inevitable. Even in the field, armies need to build fortifications to protect themselves from enemy attacks. When building a camp, you must follow the principle of protecting yourself and destroying your enemies, not turning your camp into a resort.
The complexity of modern urban defense.
The defense capabilities of ordinary cities differ from those of large cities, but the basic defense capabilities remain. Large cities, as central cities, have a higher degree of defense fortresses, providing defense depth for the country or region, and providing logistical supplies and assembly for troops. The complexity of modern cities makes it more difficult to attack, and the blind spots and blind spots of firepower are more prominent.
Street Fighting: The Difference Between the Cold Weapon Age and the Hot Weapon Age.
In the era of cold weapons, street fighting was quite terrifying for the defenders. In the absence of long-range weapons, hand-to-hand combat with direct contact is of little significance. The streets and alleys of ancient times were simpler than those of modern times, and the scale of the city was limited, and the room for maneuver was limited. In contrast, modern cities are tall and complex, and the buildings are mostly made of reinforced concrete, making it easier to hide and more complex to attack.
The challenge of modern street fighting.
Even in modern times, street fighting is the last option. If the defending team does not create an opportunity for a counterattack or offensive build-up, the defense becomes meaningless. The defending side's forces are scattered, while the attacker's forces can be easily dispatched due to the terrain, putting the defender at an absolute disadvantage. In the era of hot weapons, dispersion means defeat, and the art of war also says that it is surrounded by ten rules. After the besieged side loses its support, it is inevitable that it will have a psychological breakdown, and even if the troops are still alive, it will be difficult to gather strength again.
The Evolution of Urban Defense.
Ancient cities often had high walls, and a small number of defenders could withstand a large army. The probability of forcing a storm into the city without completely destroying the will of the defenders is quite low. However, with the advent of artillery, the walls became fragile, and even if the defenders still had the strength to spare, the city was prone to falling, creating the possibility of street fighting.
The Rise of the Age of Firearms: The Need for Street Fighting.
The limitations of cold weapons have led to street battles outweighing the losses, and in the era of firearms, especially the popularization of melee automatic**, such as submachine guns and fully semi-automatic firepower, can support the power required for street battles and the loss rate of friend and foe. The ruins formed by modern buildings can be used as defensive and hidden positions, and machine guns and sniper rifles** can become life harvesters, making it difficult for the enemy to find a foothold. In ancient times, buildings were easy to attack by fire, and white-knuckle combat was difficult to kill enemies on a large scale.
Conclusion: The law of war remains unchanged.
Although war has undergone changes in people and tactics, the laws of war have never changed. Protecting oneself and destroying the enemy remains at the heart of war. The changes in the age of cold weapons and the age of hot weapons, as well as the evolution of urban defense, all reflect the unremitting pursuit of survival and victory of human beings. In the long history of change, the essence of war is still how to destroy the enemy while protecting oneself to the greatest extent.
This article profoundly explores the power of the Cold Weapon Age and the Hot Weapon Age, as well as the evolution of urban defense in different historical periods. Through the comparative analysis of ancient and modern urban defense, the author reveals the game between offense and defense in the war and the continuous evolution of advanced technology, so that readers have a deeper understanding of the nature of war.
First of all, through the analysis of the urban topography, the paper emphasizes the natural advantages of the city as a line of defense. The author mentions the ancient Shanhaiguan, Jiayuguan and Constantinople, where the city defense maps form typical examples of the in-depth defense system. This depth layout makes the attacker encounter a series of problems when facing the defenses, such as blind spots, blind spots, and poor communication, which may eventually lead to the defeat of the attacker. This point of view is so incisive that one can't help but have a vivid imagination of the scenes of historical wars.
Secondly, the paper provides a detailed analysis of the performance of street fighting in different historical periods. In the era of cold weapons, street fighting was quite terrifying for the defenders, but in the era of hot weapons, street fighting became the last resort. This change is inseparable from the development of ** technology, such as the popularity of melee automatic**. The article delves into the characteristics of modern architecture, pointing out the defensive and hidden positions formed by its ruins, which, combined with the use of machine guns and sniper rifles, make street fighting more complicated. This analysis reveals the interaction between ** and the structure of the city, giving the reader a clearer understanding of street fighting in war.
Finally, through thinking about the laws of war, the article emphasizes that the core of war is still how to destroy the enemy while protecting oneself to the greatest extent. This kind of thinking elevates the article to a more profound level, leading the reader to think about the nature of war from a broader perspective. Through a review of history, the article makes readers realize that although war has changed in form and quality, the laws behind it are still unchangeable.
Overall, this article has both profound historical analysis and reflections on modern warfare, which enables readers to have a more comprehensive and profound understanding of warfare in the age of cold weapons and hot weapons. The author's writing is smooth and logical, making it an excellent article that deserves deep thought and discussion.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!