Guo Yanping, Yang Jinfang, Li Yue (Hexi University) Instructor: Li Wenxue.
Small scenes. Parent A: You see, I donated to the county charity and added 8 points.
Parent B: Then your child can go to a better school.
Parent A: Where is this?
Parent B: I heard that blood donation can now add points.
Parents who donate 100 ml of blood or donate 1,000 yuan to charity can add 2 points, which can play a positive role in their children's primary school enrollment ......A few days ago, some netizens said that Wuyi County, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province adopts a point admission policy for the children of new citizens, and each public primary school is selected according to the points from high to low, and parents can increase their points by participating in unpaid blood donation activities or donations. On December 11, a reporter learned that the situation was true. (December 12, Nanning Evening News).
In order to further promote the equalization of public services, the policy of arranging migrant workers to enter the household and their children to enroll in public schools is arranged by means of point ranking, which ensures the fairness of the distribution of educational resources to a certain extent. In this news report, Wuyi County has adopted this kind of points-based enrollment policy for the children of new citizens to attend local primary schools, and the school will select the best according to the parents' points from high to low.
In the "Wuyi County New Citizen Quantitative Integral Management Scoring Standard", we can see that the Wuyi County personality index scoring standard includes 7 aspects: residence, entrepreneurship, investment and taxation, invention and creation, public welfare service, talent introduction and commendation and reward, with a total of 200 points. In terms of public service, it is mentioned that parents who participate in unpaid blood donation in the county will receive 2 points for every 100 ml of blood donated, with a maximum of 30 points;Parents receive 2 points for every 1,000 yuan donated to charities in the county, with a maximum of 20 pointsThe sum of the two can reach up to 50 points, which accounts for a large proportion.
Public welfare is about voluntary participation, which should be a social consensus. However, if public welfare is linked to points, is it voluntary for parents to donate blood and donate?Or is it "no choice" due to the pressure of children going to school?Can such a "public welfare" still be regarded as a public welfare?Perhaps the county formulated and implemented this policy out of the good intentions of "encouraging people to give love, do good deeds, and do good deeds", but the way of using public welfare acts and educational opportunities will only be "counterproductive" in the end, and this method may have a temporary effect, but it will certainly not be able to develop for a long time.
The original intention of point enrollment is to improve educational fairness, linking public welfare with points, and public welfare behaviors are compatible with educational opportunities, which will only run counter to the original intention of educational equity. We must always adhere to the principle of fairness, and we must not take public welfare service as a rigid standard for assigning points, and we must not let public welfare change its taste.