Gansu ** has touched the hearts of hundreds of millions of Chinese, whether it is ordinary people or celebrities, they are successively donating money and materials to the disaster area. Celebrities carry out charity activities to set an example for the public and call on more people to volunteer for love.
As public figures, celebrities receive attention for every charity action. Sometimes, even if they deliberately choose a low-key way to do good deeds, they will be caught by netizens and cause controversy.
On December 19, the China Siyuan Project released an article to thank Na Ying, the first sister of the mainland music scene, for donating relief materials to the disaster area in Gansu. The article only mentioned that Na Ying sent a relief tent, but did not specify the number, which aroused suspicion among netizens.
Netizens feel that Na Ying has been on the cusp of the best this year, and she may be donating materials in such a low-key manner in order to win back the public's praise.
This time, Na Ying did not take the initiative to make the donation public, but chose to pay in a low-key manner at a critical moment, resulting in many people not knowing anything about this matter.
It doesn't matter whether netizens approve of it or not, Na Ying's choice of low-key donation is her style. These actions should not be a reason for netizens to speculate that she intends to clear her name. What's even more ironic is that some Naying fans called on Daolang to donate because of this, which caused a controversy.
Singer Daolang's 52-year-old age once again became the focus of heated discussions among netizens, and he was forced to accept donations to become a topic. The inevitable connection between him and Na Ying once again aroused the attention of netizens, making the two a hot topic on the Internet again.
Whether it is Na Ying or Daolang, as stars, they all bear the moral responsibility imposed on them by fans.
In society**, celebrities' incomes are considered higher than those of ordinary people, so when society is facing difficulties, the public expects them to make more charitable contributions and become role models for philanthropy. Under the expectations and pressure of fans and all walks of life, celebrities are more likely to become the target of netizens' appeals for donations.
Netizens speculated whether the amount of money and materials donated by Na Ying to the disaster area in Gansu was not disclosed because she made a bloody investment and only donated a little fur to gain a good reputation.
Before the occurrence of ** in Gansu, Daolang had already announced that he would retreat for one to three years and concentrate on ** creation. And because of a sentence from Na Ying's fans, he became a highly contrasted forced donation star.
In the eyes of the public, celebrities seem to be different from ordinary people, they seem to have lost the right to make their own choices, and only by following other celebrities to make charitable donations and show their support can they avoid being tied to moral shame.
Daolang was forced to donate, which is not only related to his historical relationship with Na Ying, but also inseparable from his personal financial situation. In July this year, Daolang, who had been silent for many years, reappeared in the public eye, and his song "Rakshasa Sea City" rekindled the enthusiasm of the ** world.
The song has sparked a lot of discussion on the internet because of its strong irony and symbolism. What's even more surprising is that the song reached 8 billion views within 11 days of its launch, and was directly praised as a divine comedy by netizens.
This song brought Daolang back to the public's attention, so netizens asked him to donate.
When it comes to donations, people should participate voluntarily, and nothing can be used as an excuse to force others to be generous. No matter how big or small the fame or income is, it shouldn't be the moral pressure that celebrities face when making donations.
The first consideration is personal financial situation, and the second is personal willingness. At special moments, self-development of public welfare behaviors is driven by inner love, rather than forced by external pressure.
In the face of doubts from the outside world, Daolang's fans have stood up to defend him. According to some fans, Daolang has not accepted interviews, participated in shows, or held concerts since he became famous, so all his income is obtained through ** creation, without any falsehood.
In addition, in recent years, Daolang has been quietly engaged in public welfare activities, and his total donation has exceeded 20 million. The reason why Daolang did not make a public donation does not mean that he is not engaged in charitable activities.
Donations from celebrities should not be morally kidnapped, no matter how big or small.
The online environment should be cleaned up, and celebrities should not become the object of netizens forcing donations or donations. The essence of true charity lies in passing on love, and the freedom to donate should be respected, rather than pouring cold water on the whole society when it is giving.
It is the onlookers who speak cool words but are unwilling to donate, not those who donate less. Respecting everyone's individual rights and fulfilling their obligations within their capacity is the true contribution and dedication to society.
Don't do bad things just because it's a small thing, and don't stop doing good things because it's a small thing. A word full of kindness is also an act of love.