Why did the "Xingui faction" led by Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi repeatedly lose to Chiang Kai-shek?The strong combat effectiveness of the Guangxi army does not seem to be able to change their fate of frequent defeats in the "battle for the Central Plains". Why?
The trade-off between localism and nationalism.
The Xingui faction was proud of "localism", but Chiang Kai-shek insisted on "nationalism". This "localism" led Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi to always regard the province as a special and most powerful place. Although the Guangxi soldiers were strong in combat, they were unable to defeat Chiang Kai-shek on a national scale because of "localism".
The way of employing people. 
"All corners of the world" is the key to achieving the goal of "unifying the world". Although Chiang Kai-shek favored the people of Zhejiang, he paid more attention to the concept of "five lakes and four seas", so that his camp included generals from all over the country. In contrast, the narrow thinking of the "new Gui system" for employing people has become a stumbling block that they cannot surpass.
Political maelstrom and historical lessons.
Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi tried to expand their influence into Hunan, but they were met with a mutiny and a dismal end in the wilderness. The lessons of history have taught them the importance of the principle of "all corners of the world", but because of the deep-rooted "localism", it is impossible to truly break through.
Success, Xiao He, defeat, Xiao He".
Although the mutiny of the young officers in Guangxi brought Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi into the wilderness, they then asked them to return to lead the "Xingui faction", which brought them back to power. However, this also means that they are unable to break through the shackles of "localism" and achieve a true "unified Central Plains".
All over the world".
In order to maintain the status of the "new Gui lineage", Li Zongren still insisted on reusing Guangxi people when he was in Anhui, which caused dissatisfaction among the locals. However, the control of the "Gui system" over Anhui could not be shaken, and the conflict between localism and "all over the world" became an obstacle that it could not overcome.
The pattern is small, and the fate is big.
All things considered, Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi may be "success and defeat and defeat Xiao He". Regionalism helped them rise, but it also limited their horizons, causing them to lose repeatedly in the competition with Chiang Kai-shek. Perhaps, their failure stems from a narrow perception of the vast land.
In this battle of power and intrigue, the "Xingui faction" was mired in the quagmire of localism and could not shake off its shackles, which ultimately prevented them from achieving greater success on the historical stage of Chinese politics.
The struggle for power in the Xingui system: the interweaving of limitations and fate.
In this article on the dispute between the "New Gui line" and Chiang Kai-shek, we see the history of the political fate of Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi, as well as the predicament in which they lived. The article profoundly analyzes the trade-off between "localism" and "nationalism", as well as the far-reaching impact of employing people on political destiny.
First of all, the article clearly pointed out that the "Xingui faction" insisted too much on "localism", which led to their repeated defeats to Chiang Kai-shek throughout the country. This shows the double-edged sword of regionalism: while it can guarantee a certain degree of local fundamentals, it limits the national expansion of the "new Gui lineage" and makes it difficult for them to compete with Chiang Kai-shek. This contradiction puts them in a difficult political chess game.
Secondly, the article mentions the decisive role of employing people in political destiny. Although Chiang Kai-shek favored the people of Zhejiang, he was more flexible in employing people, focusing on the concept of "all corners of the world", which gave his camp wider support. On the contrary, the narrow thinking of the "Xingui faction" due to its long-term reliance on "localism" prevented them from attracting wider support, and eventually became the weaker side in the political struggle.
In addition, from the perspective of historical lessons, the article shows that Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi tried to break through the shackles of "localism", but ultimately failed due to their deep-rooted thinking patterns. This kind of historical repetition has become a classic case of "success and failure", highlighting the far-reaching impact of localism on the fate of politicians.
Finally, the article reveals the strong dissatisfaction caused by the "Xingui lineage" under local rule through a description of their governance in other regions and their treatment of the local people. This is another example of the limitations of regionalism, which is that even if it has some control at the local level, it is difficult to gain recognition in a wider region.
Overall, this article profoundly explores the complex relationships between localism and nationalism, between the way of employing people and political destiny in political power schemes. Through the analysis of historical cases, readers can better understand the far-reaching impact of political decisions on the fate of politicians, and the limitations of localism in this battle of power and strategy.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!