Most of the released humanoid robots have just learned to walk, and all kinds of news have already blown into the sky - fine can do clinical surgery, rough construction site twisting steel bars, and 80% of human beings have a sense of oppression from unemployment. Actually?It's just a group of machines that have just learned to walk upright.
In order to prevent the loss of the job of grandchildren, it is better to understand what a humanoid robot (hereinafter referred to as HR) is.
In terms of appearance, HR has the external characteristics of a human being, such as the head, body, limbs, etc.
In terms of motor ability, HR can walk, shake hands, and lift objects. In order to walk, HR uses cameras, lidars, sound sensors, etc. as eyes to perceive the surrounding environment.
In addition, the senior HR also has a brain, has the ability to learn Xi on his own Creative Inspiration Center, and after a long time, he can fully understand the owner's habits, and can also communicate with humans in language and facial expressions.
So, what's HR for?
Judging from the logic of large-screen mobile phones, VR, and short-** explosions, the popularity of new things will go through a marginal period, a crazy period, a regulatory period, a sage period, and a chicken rib period.
In the early days, HR should be prominent in the service field, serving tea and pouring water, serving food on trays, receiving in the lobby, and explaining the exhibition area.
In the medical field, it is likely that it is only used for patient care, chat companionship, health monitoring, training, etc., even the most advanced surgical robots are not automated, but operated by human doctors.
In the factory environment, handling and assembly of robotic arms are sufficient, and wheeled robots are also more cost-effective than HR. There are not many jobs that require human collaboration in unmanned factories, and the capitalists say that it is not that HR cannot afford it, but that humans are more cost-effective.
In short, unless the labor cost is higher than that of robots, it is difficult for HR to land on a large scale. After all, in simple work, the annual salary of human beings is less than 100,000, and the price of a single HR will not be less than 200,000, and the maintenance cost is very high.
At present, what jobs will not be easily replaced by HR?
First of all, urgent work. The more urgent the matter, the more stable it will be, and the need for reliability and control comes first. Especially in the case of strong privacy, who would trust an HR who will not be flexible and strictly follow the process?
Second, high-risk work. Fire and water are ruthless, people are merciful, who would give their lives to the cold hr?If a secondary injury occurs during the rescue process, is the human who asks for help from HR considered self-shaping?
Finally, work that requires human care. For example, psychological counseling and emotional support, relying on calculations to make decisions HR is highly rational, and even if there is emotional intelligence, it is only based on human experience in related fields, and it is not true empathy.
Instead of betting on HR in the future, it is better to look at the lively and cute two- and three-year-old children around you, no matter how non-standard their running movements are, they can kill 99% of HR in seconds.