Revealed!The amazing fraud behind the copper bar copper rod transaction!
Recently, a shocking fraud case has surfaced. Wei has a batch of about 600 kilograms of copper copper rods and needs**, and he contacted the vendor Ge through Internet search. When the two parties traded for the purchase and sale of copper rods, Wei noticed that the weight of 400 kilograms at the time of the transaction did not match the actual weight. He checked with Ge many times to see if the scales were accurate, but received a positive answer. However, when Wei became suspicious of Ge's scales, he decided to take a closer look. After repeated questioning, Ge finally admitted that he had done something on the scale and deliberately weighed underweighing.
This fraud case not only caused Wei to lose a large amount of copper rods, but also made him suspicious of the entire trading market. So, how exactly did this case happen?Let's take a look.
First, the transaction process.
Wei contacted the vendor Ge through an Internet search, and the two parties agreed to meet in a certain place to buy and sell copper rods. In the process of trading, Wei found that the weight was wrong, and checked with Ge many times to see if the scale was accurate. In order to cover up his fraud, Ge repeatedly replied that the weighing was accurate. However, Wei did not easily believe Ge's words and decided to conduct a careful examination.
Second, scale cheating.
After repeated questioning and inspection, Ge finally admitted that he had done something on the scale and deliberately weighed underweighing. It turned out that Ge installed a cheating device on the scale, which could reduce the weight when weighing. As a result, Wei suffered losses in the course of the transaction.
3. Legal Liability.
This fraud case has been suspected of illegal and criminal acts. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the behavior of the vendor Ge who deliberately weighed underweight has constituted fraud. If the evidence is conclusive, Ge will face corresponding legal responsibilities and penalties. At the same time, this case also reminds the general public to be vigilant when trading commodities to avoid losses.
4. Reflections and suggestions.
The occurrence of this fraud case has made us deeply reflect on the regulation of the commodity trading market. In order to prevent similar incidents from happening again, we should strengthen market supervision and improve the integrity awareness of merchants. At the same time, consumers should be vigilant when trading goods and choose reputable merchants to trade. In addition, relevant departments should strengthen the supervision and inspection of weighing equipment such as scales to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the equipment.
V. Conclusion. This fraud case is a wake-up call for us. In the commodities trading market, integrity is paramount. Only by strengthening supervision and cultivating a sense of integrity can the market be more fair, just and transparent. At the same time, consumers should also be vigilant and choose reputable merchants for transactions. Only in this way can we jointly create a healthy and orderly commodity trading market environment.
The trader used a ghost scale for an adult man to weigh less than 60 pounds, and netizens condemned the fraud!