I stumbled upon the ** above. It is said that women who are taking care of children in marriage, especially those who are taking care of children full-time, should be compensated in the event of divorce by receiving reasonable "alimony" between husband and wife.
Makes sense.
Judges see more in this regard, and judges should know this truth better than anyone else. However, in the current judicial environment, women with children often do not receive the "alimony" they deserve in the trial practice of the courts. Not to mention advocating for the woman's own "alimony", even the woman who raises the child after the divorce is mostly difficult to get a reasonable and legal judgment in the judicial trial of asking for child support. In the current court system, judicial injustices such as arbitrarily adjudicating and bullying the weak and fearing the hard are still widespread.
In fact, in real life, there are many men with children, and there are also many men with children full-time, who will also encounter such unreasonable treatment.
If there is a miscarriage of justice, both men and women, and whoever seeks judicial redress for the unfairness, will be treated unfairly.
Why is it that court trials are often accompanied by judicial corruption?
An important reason is that the legitimate party, whether male or female, often does not engage in judicial corruption, because they feel that they are justified and legitimate, and the judge's judgment will naturally support the justified and legitimate self. As everyone knows, the party that ignores the lawbreaker, whether it is a man or a woman, often wants to make their unreasonableness and illegality through corrupt judges.
Judicial corruption is the transfer of benefits to judges, and in the face of interests, many judges with low quality tend to arbitrarily adjudicate and often favor the party that conveys benefits to judges, regardless of whether this side is male or female. Not only that, but some unscrupulous judges have also tried in every possible way to engage in the set of "big caps and hats with both ends upturned, and the plaintiff eats the defendant after eating".
I once met a post judge who undertook a case of asking for "alimony" between husband and wife, and that judge, who was also the president of the "First Civil Division" of a certain court, did not know that the "alimony" between husband and wife was not the "alimony" of the child!Such high-powered "legal illiteracy" is not uncommon among judges.
* The problems reflected in the report can only be solved by eradicating judicial corruption. Judicial corruption can cause many parties to be wrongedHowever, there is still a long way to go in the work of eradicating judicial corruption.
One person cheers for the graduate school entrance examination