1. Aoki in the distance fabricated facts such as "squatting on the ground to eat fines".
At the beginning of the article, Aoki posted a so-called "Liangshan squatting on the ground to eat with a fine of 20 yuan", and said that this was a fine set up in Liangshan to reduce the expenditure of poverty alleviation funds. This is a complete fabrication of facts, which is seriously inconsistent with the actual situation on the ground. The author's use of misleading readers to win attention can be described as inconsistent. On the one hand, it depicts the "hellish" and difficult poverty alleviation environment in Liangshan, and on the other hand, it says that the expenditure of poverty alleviation funds is too much and needs to be reduced. This rumor is already a malicious smear of Liangshan's image.
2. Distorting the intention of the "Five Washing Project" to guide the negative.
The article also mentions the so-called "Five Washing Project", saying that local women "do not bathe or wash their hair". These descriptions are also inconsistent with the facts, and can only be said to demonize the local population. The original intention of the Five Washing Project was to provide villagers with poor living conditions with washing knowledge and help them establish good hygiene habits. Aoki in the distance distorts the facts and creates a negative ** orientation.
3. Repeatedly fabricating facts to harm the public interest.
A review of other reports and commentaries from distant Aoki reveals that this is not the first time that the facts have been distorted. During the epidemic prevention and control period this year, he spread rumors to mislead the public;In last year's celebrity selection of civil servants, he was on the wrong side. Official** such as the Observer Network has criticized it by name for fabricating facts and creating topics. Its social accounting is only for the sake of traffic, regardless of news facts and moral bottom line.
Fourth, Liangshan poverty alleviation has achieved remarkable results How can there be "hell difficulty".
In fact, in recent years, Liangshan has made great progress in infrastructure, education, poverty alleviation and other aspects. The living standards of the local people have also improved markedly, and they have been lifted out of poverty in the past. Aoki turned a blind eye in the distance and insisted on making a negative portrayal of Liangshan's poverty alleviation, and the motive was deeply regrettable. We call on the local authorities and relevant authorities to take legal measures against them to stop such fabrication of facts and damage to the image of the region.
5. Fabricating News to Harm Others and Yourself Aoki's reputation in the distance has gone bankrupt.
The incident quickly caused heated discussions on the Internet, and many netizens strongly condemned what Aoki did in the distance. Some netizens think that he is purely a rumor-mongering and his reputation is bankrupt;Some netizens think that this is to create a topic to attract attention, and it has reached the point of immorality;Some netizens bluntly said that they retaliated against social psychology and suggested that this kind of false reporting should be stopped as soon as possible. In short, what Aoki has done in the distance has seriously harmed the public interest, and we call on the majority of netizens to remain rational and not to be misled by it. It is hoped that the departments concerned will take measures to stop the spread of this phenomenon of fabricated news.
Summary and Suggestions:
To sum up, Aoki from afar has repeatedly fabricated facts and created negative behaviors in Liangshan's poverty alleviation reports, which has seriously damaged Liangshan's national image. In view of the growing influence of their social media accounts, we call on the relevant authorities to implement the necessary supervision of their accounts to prevent the continued spread of such false reports that harm the public interestAt the same time, I also hope that the majority of netizens can maintain rationality and judgment and not be misled. What do you think should be done to further curb the spread of fabricated news?