In the long history of China, from the first prime minister Li Si to the Qing Dynasty, there were incomplete statistics of a total of 1,551 prime ministers. Among them, some prime ministers have made outstanding contributions to the development of Chinese civilizationSome prime ministers are mediocre and incompetent, misleading the monarch and the country;There are also prime ministers who have a lot of controversy, and they don't talk much. Today, we're going to focus on some of the most controversial prime ministers and dive into their roles in history.
Tian Qianqiu was the last prime minister of the Han Wu Dynasty, and after his predecessor Liu Qu was framed by the crown prince Liu Ju along with Jiang Chong, Tian Qianqiu became prime minister. He formulated a feudal land measurement system, and he was cautious and respectful. In the relationship between Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty towards Liu Qu and his courtiers, Tian Qianqiu Mingzhe protected himself, and there was nothing to blame after coming to power. Although he lost power in the political struggle after Emperor Zhao of Han ascended the throne, the courtiers still respected him, and the emperor treated him well, even allowing him to enter the palace in a small car and enjoy a moment of honor.
Zhao Wen was the prime minister of the Eastern Han Dynasty, who lived in the phase for 15 years, first moved the capital to Chang'an, and then moved the capital to Xuchang. Unlike ordinary people, his political opponent Li Xuzhang wanted to kill him, but his younger brother was afraid of Zhao Wen's prestige and dissuaded him. Even though Cao Cao took Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty hostage and appointed himself as Sikong, Zhao Wen still served as Situ, showing extraordinary political wisdom. The person who can make Cao Cao daunting must not be a good stubble. Lao Feng believes that Zhao Wen has been in the phase for 15 years and is well versed in the way of self-preservation.
Yang Zaisi was the prime minister of the two dynasties, and served as the prime minister twice during the Wu Zetian and Tang Zhongzong periods. He was known for his efforts to cater to the emperor and flattery, and his political achievements were lackluster. However, he was prosperous and stood tall in political struggles. While some people questioned his intentions, Yang Zaisi replied: "The world is difficult, and the upright often suffer disasters. If I don't do this, how can I protect myself?His political wisdom may be worth emulating.
Wen Tiren was the first assistant to the cabinet during the Chongzhen period of the Ming Dynasty and served for 6 years. Some people criticized him as the main culprit for the deterioration of the situation in the Ming Dynasty, and blindly pandered to the will of the Ming Dynasty and excluded dissidents, which was hated by the Donglin Party. Lao Feng thinks that such criticism is too harsh, because the Donglin Party members themselves are not good. Wen Tiren is shrewd and capable, especially in financial management. He is honest and self-controlled, and never bribes, which is extremely rare in the corrupt officialdom of the late Ming Dynasty. Posthumously presented as Taifu and nicknamed "Wenzhong" (Wenchen's nickname is the second rank, second only to Wenzheng), these show that he is not a complete traitor.
Cao Zhenyong was the first assistant of the military aircraft in the middle and late Qing Dynasty, the three dynasties of Jiaqing, Daoguang and Xianfeng, and the tumbler in the **. His principle of being an official is "kowtow more and open less", and he is ridiculed as a "dumb prime minister". However, Lao Feng believes that Cao Zhenyong is a person of great political wisdom. In the highly monarchical Qing Dynasty, ministers often lost their official positions, and Cao Zhenyong's six-character principle allowed him to stand tall in the late Qing Dynasty. As the most unobtrusive military aircraft chief assistant of the Qing Dynasty, he was posthumously awarded the highest honor of Wenchen, nicknamed "Wenzheng", and was personally mourned by the emperor, which is enough to show that his political wisdom is extraordinary.
These prime ministers have played different roles in Chinese history, and the interweaving of light and shadow makes people think about the complex identity of prime ministers in the long course of history. Everyone is welcome to discuss in the comment area and make progress and grow together together.
This article vividly outlines the figures of China's prime ministers in the past dynasties, and deeply analyzes their gains and losses in the long river of history. From the cautious prime minister Tian Qianqiu to the mute prime minister Cao Zhenyong, each prime minister has shown different political wisdom and principles of life.
First of all, Tian Qianqiu's cautiousness is particularly precious in the political struggle. He served as the prime minister of the Han Wu Emperor's dynasty, and his wisdom in protecting himself enabled him to successfully avoid Liu Qu's mistakes. Although he lost power during the later reign of Emperor Zhao of the Han Dynasty, his incorruptibility and prudence earned him the respect of his courtiers and the preferential treatment of the emperor. This cautious attitude to politics has been highly praised in history, and Tian Qianqiu's political career has also reflected this to a certain extent.
As an evergreen tree in the Eastern Han Dynasty, Zhao Wen lived in the phase for 15 years, and his political wisdom was reflected in different political situations. His ability to deal with the threat of political opponents was particularly impressive, not only moving the capital twice, but also maintaining relative stability despite Cao Cao's strong rise. This kind of perseverance and determination have made him stand tall in the political arena, which is really rare.
Yang Zaisi, mentioned in the article, is known for his flattery and self-preservation, and his political wisdom is thought-provoking. Despite his flattery, his official fortunes have always been prosperous in the midst of complex and volatile political struggles. Yang Zaisi's words when answering why he wanted to bend his mind to meet him, he showed a deep understanding of self-preservation. This makes one wonder whether a prime minister should remain principled or pander to the times in a political arena full of self-deceit.
Wen Tiren's performance during the Chongzhen period of the Ming Dynasty was also quite controversial. Although some believe that he is to blame for the deterioration of the situation in the Ming Dynasty, the positive comments about him in the article are well documented. His financial skills and self-discipline were particularly dazzling in those corrupt times. For the posthumous gift of Taifu and the nickname "Wenzhong", as well as the emperor's personal condolences, these honors reflect to a certain extent that he is not a complete traitor.
Finally, the mute prime minister, Cao Zhenyong, has become a highlight of the article with his unique political principles. Under the political system of the Qing Dynasty, although his principle of kowtowing more and talking less is ironic as a "dumb prime minister", it also makes him stand tall in the treacherous late Qing Dynasty. This unique political wisdom makes people think deeply about how a prime minister who can gain a foothold in the political arena for a long time should choose between his principles and positions.
To sum up, this article vividly outlines the brilliance and shadow of different prime ministers through an in-depth analysis of their long history. Each prime minister has a unique political style and wisdom, which has a positive inspiration for our understanding of history and politics. In the stories of these prime ministers, we may find some profound reflections on scheming and loyalty, wisdom and principle.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!