Netizens have the following answers, which are as follows:
1st answer: --
Professional quantitative traders rarely pay attention to such technical analysis indicators. **The definition of Bollinger Bands and MACD lines is relatively clear, and it is easy to do verification, which also leads to a lot of people who actually do it, and it is unlikely that there will be excess profits, so there is no need to pay attention all the time.
If you really use actual historical data to do rigorous analysis, put forward a clear strategy to verify, and at the same time don't look at the kind of metaphysical statements that are said and not said, and cannot provide any meaningful information, then this is not much different from quantitative trading.
But if you spend your days trying to find out what the market is doing and what it doesn't, the unverifiable notion that it evolves in a trending way, or the fact that history repeats itself but not simply repeats itself, you're wasting your precious time.
2nd answer: --
To put it another way, quantitative tools are the technological tools of the new era.
Nowadays, there are a wide variety of technical tools that are simple to operate, and they are not available at the beginning, but they are all used by people and gradually promoted.
In the end, a high degree of convergence in simple technical analysis does not lead to excess returns, and quantitative tools also have this trend.
Now it seems mysterious that the level of technological development has not yet reached the point of great material wealth, and these quantitative tools are foolishly distributed to the public.
Back in the early days, the implementation of technical tools also depends on their own hands, not something that can be found in two clicks in the software.
The ability to harvest wool is comparable to that of the current quantification tools. There are many people who find a signal and make a fortune.
Personally, I believe that the main reason for quantification to become the mainstream is the change in market structure brought about by the technical upgrade of the exchange.
For example, exchange arbitrage has requirements for the exchange's ** sending and order access, and the exchange technology is not upgraded at all.
It is too extreme to say that technical tools are astrology, and the idea of technical instrumentalism and quantitative tools are in the same vein.
In particular, some of the later complex technical tools have clearly looked like the predecessors of quantitative tools.
It is nothing more than that traditional technical tools are no longer enough to support more complex processing, and everyone has started a new craft.
Mainstream quantitative ideas have had corresponding technical tools at least ten years ago, but there is a lack of public versions.
I've seen some small programs written by old traders around 04 years ago (no GUI is really ugly) and a lot of VBA.
These programs and VBA provide signals that traders manually. Semi-automated trading is already possible on some instruments.
It can be clearly said that liquidity tracking, correlation arbitrage, and multi-factor stock selection are all there.
Of course, the mathematical models and specific implementations used in it are very simple and crude, and there are so many parameters for patting the brain...
But ten years ago, it was a lot of money.
Figures like Renaissance, Citadel, Shaw, Jump, Tower are not so much the epitome of quantitative tools as technical tools.
I think they are the first representatives to discover and realize the informatization of the financial industry, and the technological advantages of these companies are reflected in various aspects.
But you ask me whether it's a technical tool or a quantitative tool.
I don't have to say that you are going to make a big news again, and who is responsible for the deviation.
From the perspective of a trader with professional experience in financial speculation, both technical analysis and quantitative trading are important tools, but they are used differently and for different purposes.
Technical analysis is a method of future movements by studying data such as history, trading volume, etc. Some of the basic concepts and tools of technical analysis are still widely used in professional quantitative trading. For example, Bollinger Bands, MACD lines, etc. are commonly used technical indicators to assist in trading decisions. However, professional quantitative traders focus more on developing verifiable trading strategies based on rigorous data analysis and statistical methods. They generally avoid focusing too much on metaphysical technical analysis methods that do not provide clear guidance.
Quantitative trading, on the other hand, is a method of executing trading decisions through mathematical models and algorithms. With the development of computer technology, quantitative tools and methods are becoming more and more abundant and sophisticated. Some professional traders believe that quantitative tools are a new generation of technical tools, and it is inevitable that quantitative trading will become mainstream with the upgrading of exchange technology and changes in market structure. These quantitative tools can help traders better understand and ** market behavior, leading to higher returns.
For quantitative trading, it is recommended to take a look at the book below.
In conclusion, both technical analysis and quantitative trading are important financial tools, and professional traders will choose the right method according to the actual situation and needs. For beginners, it is helpful to understand basic technical analysis methods and learn how to use quantitative tools Xi.
I am a leek farmer (below), long-term ** programmatic trading strategy, follow me to get more ** related information and experience.