Analysis of the reasons for the failure of the review of teachers' deputy senior professional titles, and the need to be cautious to avoid risks
Introduction: When a professor is promoted to associate professor, the defense is an indispensable part. Many people think that the ** defense is"Fight against counterfeiting", but not really. This article will share the main reasons for the failure of the defense of the promotion to associate professor** and suggest some ways to avoid failure. First of all, it's worth mentioning the issue of uploading files. To ensure the quality of the supporting documents uploaded, professors are advised to seek the help of professionals. Secondly, the reason for the failure of the defense session may be the participation of non-teaching staff, personnel who are far away from the teaching frontline, or personnel who do not match the position. In addition, this link is also a one"De-deterioration"The process of weeding out those who do not have the basic qualities of a teacher. In the teaching process, teachers should pay attention to the links of taking off the script, reflecting on the role of students, and interacting with students. It is worth mentioning that when faced with the defense question, the teacher can say that he will not do it and ask the judges to change the question. Finally, we need to learn from the failures of others and avoid falling into the pit when promoting the title. It is hoped that all teachers will be promoted smoothly.
Try asking a professional to help upload the file.
The first step in promoting the deputy senior title is to upload materials, which seems simple, but it is prone to problems. Some teachers may not be able to be promoted because they did not upload materials as required. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the quality of the uploaded supporting materials and **.
To ensure the quality of uploaded documents, teachers are advised to seek professional help as much as possible. Teachers who are applying for tenure promotion for the first time, due to lack of experience, may not upload documents and ** that are not clear and aesthetically pleasing, or are not uploaded as required. Some teachers even take photos and upload them directly, resulting in inversion. Therefore, we should pay attention to the standardization and aesthetics of the uploaded materials.
It is also important to Xi the relevant title promotion documents. Teachers need to know how to upload, what to upload, etc. While it is possible to do these things on your own, it takes a lot of time and effort. In contrast, it is easier and less prone to errors when it comes to finding help from a professional. You can find out what teachers who have been successfully promoted in the previous year have done, and usually a supervisor from the local education office or human resources office will help. They are all experienced people, and you only need to show the relevant certificates, saving time and effort.
Reasons why interviews and defenses fail.
The main functions of the lecture and defense are:"Fight against counterfeiting"。For non-normal personnel, those who have left front-line teaching positions and those who are not suitable for their posts, lectures and interviews are a screening process with the aim of selecting truly capable and high-quality front-line teachers. Therefore, if you fail this session, it is likely that your inaccuracies have already been discovered by the judges.
For example, there is a teacher who is a staff member of a central school who does not usually attend classes, but is involved in teaching as a front-line teacher when he is promoted to a higher position. Although he spent a lot of time preparing for the class, he was still recognized by the judges during the defense. When the judges asked him which school year he had taught this year, or when he asked about the special textbook unit, the answer was wrong because he was not a front-line teacher and had been away from front-line teaching for a long time. Therefore, the main reasons for disqualification are that they are not familiar with the textbook, the answers to the questions in the defense link are incorrect, and the votes of the judges are not more than two-thirds.
Except"Fight against counterfeiting"In addition to the function, there is another important function of the teaching defense war:"Eliminate the inferior"。That is, weeding out those who do not meet the requirements of the basic qualities of teachers. In accordance with the existing evaluation mechanism,"The last place is eliminated"is a common form. For example, individual teachers who make low-level mistakes, such as knowledge errors, board writing errors, etc., are not recognized. If a Chinese teacher makes a writing mistake or a math teacher makes an intellectual mistake and directly states his or her knowledge points, he will be rejected by one vote.
In order to successfully defend the defense, teachers should pay attention to several points when making their statements. First of all, it's important not to follow the script and not rely on lesson plans. One teacher's defense failed because he didn't read the whole story. Secondly, it is necessary to reflect the main position of students and interact with students. From the introduction, board book, re-Xi, teaching of new courses, board performances, group activities, practical operations, summary and re-Xi, homework and other links, no one is missing. At the same time, the class time should be well controlled, not too long or too short. Some teachers may think that they are first-class lecturers after listening to the introduction session for two minutes because of the good arrangement of the introduction session, and then go directly to the defense session. In addition, in addition to the questions related to this lesson, questions related to the new curriculum standards can be added to the questions of the defense. For subjects such as Chinese and mathematics, teachers only need to have a general understanding and do not have to give standard answers. As for English, questions relating to the new curriculum standards are generally not raised.
Finally, if asked a question that they didn't know during the defense, the teacher can honestly say that he or she didn't know and ask another question to the judges. Honesty and sincerity are sometimes important. At this year's defense meeting, many teachers were asked"Fourth, there are good teachers"What are the standards, which tells us that in addition to learning Xi textbooks and new curriculum standards, we also need to pay attention to some education-related content.
In short, the classroom defense session is an important stage for promotion to deputy senior level. In order to avoid failure, teachers should pay attention to the standardization and aesthetics of the uploaded materials, and try to seek professional help. During the interview, lecture and defense, the whole process should be taken off the script, reflecting the main position of the student and interacting with the student. At the same time, be prepared for possible questions, be honest about what you don't understand, and ask different questions. Finally, learn from the failures of others and avoid falling into the pit. It is hoped that all teachers can successfully pass the professional title evaluation.
Resources**.