Warning
This content is for personal understanding only
There is no purpose for guidance
Human beings, how arrogant they are!
Humans set all sorts of standards, but wonder why doesn't God follow them?
While praying that the sky has eyes, he complains that it is cold and ruthless.
God is dead. Because man has defined a false God.
A God defined by a social hierarchy is bound to disappoint society.
Beautiful jade and stone, because we have differences and desires, we can see the difference between them at the first time, and if there is no desire and discrimination, aren't they the same?
The crowd is clear, and I am alone.
Everyone watched, but I was alone.
How clever they were, how quick they were to see the difference, and I was like a piece of wood, so stupid and overwhelmed that I could only make up a lie to make them think I saw the difference.
There is a powerful driving force for the formation of the universe, which generates a huge amount of energy to enable all things in the universe to circulate, and in the process of circulation, all things interact with each other and intermingle, and then generate a more prosperous world in the universe.
A whale falls, and everything is born.
Taoism talks about conforming to nature, but its essence is against nature, and Buddhism talks about letting go, and its essence is because of attachment.
Because if we go against nature, we will talk about conforming to nature, because we will say letting go, if we don't go against nature and are not attached, how can we conform and let go?
There was nothing in the first place, where to stir up dust.
The more frequent the communication between people, the more purposeful and appealing they are.
Without appeal, without purpose, there will be no communication and exchange.
The more exchanges, and the more demands do not increase, the fewer and fewer exchanges will be.
Just like Lao Tzu's depiction of the old and the dead do not get along, everyone has no needs for each other and does not need to communicate.
In the same way, the more demands there are, the more communication is needed, and the increasing demands of continued non-communication will touch the limits of natural non-equilibrium, which will destroy the state.
The development of human society cannot completely conform to nature.
It must be to go against it and then conform to it.
Completely conform to it, the individual achieves nothing, and the country does not develop.
Completely complying with it must be the result of a small country and a widow, and there can be no prosperity.
What human beings have to do is how to not go against nature so excessively, which is an eternal topic.
Human beings should have fun in the fence of the natural world, not think about jumping out of the fence, because if they can't jump out, they will only change from one fence to another.
To understand the Tao Te Ching, we need to jump out of the world, and to understand the Tao Te Ching, we need to jump out of the world, and to understand the balance theory, we need to return to the eggshell on the basis of the former.
The natural world, for the people and things in this world, has drawn a fence.
Whether we use it in this section or not, this fence will not disappear.
Let's say we're standing on the left side of the fence and we see food on the right side of the fence and we want to go over.
When this idea arises, an imbalance is created, and this imbalance is the first central equilibrium of the balance discourse.
When we have the basis of imbalance, how do we get this food in the past, this is the second core path of the balance discourse, if there is a block in the middle, we will try to skip it, or remove it, this process is the meaning of perseverance.
When we reach the edge of the fence, this is the third core limit of the balance discourse, and when we try to go beyond this limit, the natural world will disappear the fence and create a new one.
The most ** fence is the state that the natural world wants us to achieve the most, and the Tao Te Ching is to let us stay in this center, and the core of the balance discourse is that as long as we are within the scope of this fence, we can swing as much as we want.