Readers who have read "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" know that Guan Yu and Cao Cao's complex relationship is far better than that of other brothers. Guan Yu was besieged by Cao Cao in Xiapi City, and after being captured, Cao Cao treated him with great courtesy, and even worshiped him as a partial general. In the battle of Guandu, Guan Yu beheaded Yan Liang, relieved the siege of the White Horse, punished Wen Chou, and repaid Cao Cao for not killing.
Cao Cao and Guan Yu have similar personalities, but after all, one will not do the other. After Guan Yu killed six generals after five levels, Cao Cao understood that he couldn't keep him, so he had to order his subordinates not to chase and kill. If Guan Yu hadn't been captured by Sun Quan back then, he might have been able to save his life.
In "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Cao Cao also fell into the hands of Guan Yu. Before the Battle of Chibi, Zhuge Liang ** Cao Cao was defeated and took Huarong Road, and arranged for Guan Yu to guard in advance. Guan Yu was grateful for the kindness and let Cao Cao go back to Jiangling. Later, Sun Quan beheaded Guan Yu, and Cao Cao got his head, and the two had a deep friendship.
Some people may wonder if Guan Yu hadn't let Cao Cao go, where would history go?However, after careful analysis, Guan Yu must let Cao Cao go, otherwise he will face three major problems.
First of all, if Guan Yu killed Cao Cao, Wu Wei would join forces to destroy the Shu Kingdom. Before the Battle of Chibi, Shu was the weakest, and Wu Wei joining forces would make it fall into a hard battle, and even risk losing the country. This was an unbearable burden for Guan Yu and Shu at that time.
Secondly, Guan Yu's reputation will be damaged. Guan Yu took "loyalty" as the criterion all his life, and let Cao Cao go in order to maintain righteousness. Among the people, Guan Yu's prestige is very high, and if he kills Cao Cao, he will be accused of being ungrateful and discredited.
In the end, if Guan Yu killed Cao Cao, Shu was bound to be in civil strife. Zhuge Liang deliberately released Cao Cao to maintain the overall situation, and he knew that Cao Cao could not die. If Guan Yu goes against the plan and becomes estranged from Zhuge Liang, Shu will be in danger of falling apart.
Therefore, it was inevitable for Guan Yu to let Cao Cao go. This is not a fiction, but an inevitable choice of history. Guan Yu's wisdom and loyalty defused the potential crisis at a critical moment, allowing the history of the Three Kingdoms to maintain its unique trajectory.
This article profoundly analyzes the complex relationship between Guan Yu and Cao Cao in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", as well as Guan Yu's historical decision to let Cao Cao go on Huarong Road. Through the analysis of the ** plot, the author triggered my thinking about historical figures and the imagination of the "if" scene.
First of all, through the analysis of the relationship between Guan Yu and Cao Cao, the author highlights Guan Yu's loyalty. When Xiapi City was besieged, Cao Cao actually courteously treated Guan Yu, and Guan Yu's performance in the Battle of Guandu was a reward for Cao Cao's grace not to kill. This manifestation of the spirit of loyalty and righteousness has made Guan Yu a highly respected figure in history and **.
Secondly, the article analyzes the consequences of Guan Yu letting Cao Cao go. If Guan Yu had killed Cao Cao in the first place, it might have led Wu and Wei to join forces and plunge Shu into a crisis, which would have had a profound impact on the direction of history. At the same time, Guan Yu's reputation will also be tarnished, as he has always been known for his righteousness, and killing Cao Cao may lead to doubts about his image of loyalty. In addition, the author mentions that Guan Yu let Cao Cao go in order to maintain the overall situation, as well as the tacit understanding with Zhuge Liang, which also adds points to Guan Yu's wisdom and loyalty.
Finally, the article provides in-depth reflection on the "ifs" of historical choices. The author points out that Guan Yu's letting Cao Cao go is not fiction, but an inevitable choice of history. This makes the reader think about the rationality and inevitability of numerous decisions in history, and the role that each figure has played in history.
In general, this article skillfully guides readers to think deeply about the complex relationship between Guan Yu and Cao Cao, as well as the impact of the decisions made by the characters in history at critical moments on the direction of the entire history. The writing is smooth and logical, allowing readers to better understand and think about this legendary and complex period of the Three Kingdoms period in Chinese history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!