The modern entertainment industry is booming, and many entertainment practitioners strive to bring their daily work and life to the TV screen to create down-to-earth and engaging programs. Among them, the treasure industry is eye-catching, however, Wang Gang's smashing of 200 million cultural relics eight years ago became an accident. What caused the expert to make a mistake, and how did it all end?
1. The wonderful blend of treasure appreciation and entertainment.
China has a long history, and all kinds of cultural relics emerge in endlessly. Due to the upward and downward effects, not only the imperial family regarded antiques as treasures, but even officials and businessmen also rose up to collect treasures. Not only have a large number of treasures emerged in the past dynasties, but also gave rise to treasure connoisseurs and counterfeiting markets. After the reform and opening up in the eighties, private collections gradually emerged, but the level of appreciation did not match the development of the market, which promoted the rise of antique popularization programs. With the rise of foreign reality shows, treasure connoisseur programs such as Wang Gang's "World Collection" have become popular, allowing the audience to understand the inside of the collecting industry and popularize traditional cultural knowledge.
Second, the success code of "World Collection".
The key to the success of The World Collection is the invitation of China's top contemporary treasure connoisseurs, which is very different from traditional places such as pawn shops and private museums. In order to ensure accuracy, the program stipulates that several experts must agree on the judgment of the antique and prevent individual mistakes. In the Chinese collecting world, the counterfeiting of cultural relics and the collection of cultural relics in the past dynasties constitute a pair of enemies, and antique collectors are often also masters of counterfeiting. The success of the show is related to the presence of high-level experts, however, even a professional treasure team is difficult to avoid accidents.
Third, the world's collection missed a blow.
The link in the program "removing the fake and preserving the truth" has a certain gambling nature, and the appraiser hopes to verify the authenticity of his collection through the program, and at the same time attract potential buyers with the help of hot spots. Fu Changyong took a pair of sweet white glazed water cups to the show, communicated with the program team in advance, and if it was identified as a fake, it could be smashed by Wang Gang himself. However, after the experts unanimously determined that the water cup was fake, Fu Changyong hesitated and brought the fragments back for re-identification. After the results came out, experts confirmed that it was a 600-year-old cultural relic, worth as much as 200 million yuan. Fu Changyong felt a loss and sued the program team for compensation.
Fourth, the waves caused by the loss of the eye.
The court did not support Fu Changyong's claim based on the contract signed with the program team, but the incident greatly damaged the reputation of the program team. Fu Changyong had no objection at first, but someone was willing to buy fragments for 20,000 yuan, which aroused his suspicions. Fu Changyong recovered the fragments and found other experts to re-identify them, and the results confirmed that they were cultural relics with a value of up to 200 million yuan. Although the court believed that the value of the cultural relics was not large, Fu Changyong was still dissatisfied with the result and sued the program team for compensation.
Fifth, the truth of cultural relics: the mystery of the treasure industry.
There are many cultural relics in China, and fakes are emerging in endlessly. The door to the identification of cultural relics is profound, and it is not easy for ordinary people to understand. Porcelain is an important part of this, and the master can skillfully copy the ancient porcelain, making it difficult to identify the instrument. Disagreement among experts is common. In this industry, we should listen more and watch less, and experts should not be complacent, and we need to make comprehensive use of various new technologies to support it. There is no end to learning, and for the antiques industry, it should not be too arbitrary, because it covers a wide range of people's hearts.
Conclusion: The antiques industry is unfathomable.
In the antique industry, it is difficult to distinguish between the real and the fake, and identification is a profound knowledge. Collectors and experts alike need to be cautious and not take one-sided claims lightly. Learning Xi and innovation go hand in hand, and the comprehensive use of various technical means can establish a foothold in this unfathomable field. Behind the treasure appreciation program, there is a game between cultural relics and the market, and the twists and turns in the story also make us deeply feel the unique charm of the antique industry.
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the truth behind treasure shows, and the ripple effects of expert mistakes involved in the modern entertainment industry. First of all, the article reveals the underlying phenomenon of the antiques industry by describing the wonderful blend of treasure appreciation and entertainment. In this process, the value and authenticity of cultural relics have become the focus of attention, and the treasure appreciation program has become a window for the audience to understand the insider of the collecting industry and traditional cultural knowledge.
It is worth affirming that the success of "The World Collection" is that it invites China's top contemporary treasure experts to present a real and interesting world of collecting to the audience through professional appraisal and comprehensive evaluation. This success lies not only in the professional presentation, but also in the combination of entertainment and cultural heritage, so that the audience can gain knowledge while being entertained.
However, the article also vividly depicts the waves caused by the first blow of the treasure appreciation program. Through specific cases, such as Fu Changyong's story, readers deeply feel that the judgment of experts may not be absolutely accurate. This situation not only affects the confidence of individual collectors, but also has a negative effect on the reputation of the entire program. This makes one wonder whether entertainment programs should be more cautious in dealing with potentially controversial links while pursuing eye-catching effects.
By citing the court's judgment, the article shows the way in which such incidents are handled from a legal perspective, but it also reflects that the law cannot cover everything, especially in the measurement of the value of cultural relics. The series of twists and turns in the identification of a pair of white-glazed water cups, from being a fake to being re-identified by experts as a 600-year-old cultural relic, and then to the court's belief that their value is not great, highlights the complexity and subjectivity of the identification of cultural relics, and also makes the application of the law in this field more challenging.
Finally, the article concludes by summarizing the unfathomable depths of the antiques industry, emphasizing the need to be cautious about this industry, listen more and watch less. At the same time, it was also mentioned that experts should not be complacent, and need to continue to learn and Xi and make comprehensive use of various technical means. This view helps to guide readers to maintain a rational attitude towards the antiques industry, and at the same time calls on industry experts to continue to innovate and adapt to the development of the times.
To sum up, this review** provides a comprehensive and profound analysis of the phenomenon of treasure appreciation programs through detailed cases and in-depth analysis. By reading the article, readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of how the program works, as well as the risks and challenges involved.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!