In depth analysis of the adjustment of the military region under the 1985 Chengkun Change million

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-19

In 1985, a strategic coincidence triggered by the disarmament of one million, the Kunming Military Region was unfortunately merged into the Chengdu Military Region. Reveal the deep reasons and military strategy behind the decision, and the truth of Chengkun's change**!

In 1985, China carried out a large-scale disarmament of one million yuan on an unprecedented scale, and streamlining and reorganization were surging. In this disarmament war, the Kunming Military Region was supposed to be retained, but in the end it was miraculously merged into the Chengdu Military Region. This "Chengkun change" makes people wonder what kind of strategic considerations led to this decision

The Great Disarmament of One Million: The Course of the Adjustment of the Strategic Structure of Our Army.

Since the reform and opening up in 1978, the squadron has undergone two streamlining and reorganization, but even so, the strength is still as high as 42380,000 people. Faced with the problems of low level of mechanization, low degree of synthesis, and irrational design of the system, the Military Commission decided to launch a new round of large-scale disarmament of one million in 1985. The readjustment of the large military region has become the core of this disarmament.

Adjustment of Military Region: The "Chengdu-Kunming Change" between the Kunming Military Region and the Chengdu Military Region

Among the 11 major military regions, the Kunming and Chengdu military regions have become the focus of readjustment because of the overlap of strategic tasks. Although the CMC preferred to retain the Kunming Military Region before the adjustment plan was officially issued, the final decision was to merge the Kunming Military Region into the Chengdu Military Region. This change makes people wonder what caused the "Chengkun Change"?

In 1985, the deep reasons for the "Chengkun Change" were revealed.

The war in southern Xinjiang: a non-long-term strategic mission.

Since 1979, the Kunming Military Region has presided over the war in southern Xinjiang and has performed well. However, the end of the fighting in southern Xinjiang made the designation of the organs of the Kunming Military Region a problem, so it became a more reasonable choice to merge it into the Chengdu Military Region.

Chengdu's geographical advantage: the transportation hub of the southwest.

Chengdu is strategically located as a transportation hub in the southwest. As a large rear, Chengdu not only has a rich military industry, but also has convenient transportation and strategic depth is obviously better than Kunming.

Strategic considerations: the influence of the location of the military district organs.

Strategic depth is crucial to the location of military district organs. Chengdu's geographical conditions made it more suitable as a large rear area, and the problems that might arise from Kunming's fixed border line after the end of the war in southern Xinjiang became a consideration.

The Kunming Military Region withdrew from the stage of history.

In June 1986, the Kunming Military Region's Aftermath Office was abolished, marking the Kunming Military Region's complete withdrawal from the stage of history. Although the number no longer exists, the senior generals trained by the Kunming Military Region have become the mainstay of the future military career, among which the best have become outstanding representatives.

The historical legacy of the Chengkun Change.

The 11th Division of the former Kunming Military Region was incorporated into the Chengdu Military Region, and the Chengdu Military Region retained the essence of the Kunming Military Region and became the main field army. In the new round of military reform in 2017, most of the bloodlines of the 14th Group Army were retained in the 75th Group Army of the Southern Theater, and the historical legacy of the Chengkun Revolution continued to play an important role in army construction.

Epilogue. The 1985 "Chengkun Change" was the product of a strategic readjustment in the million-dollar disarmament. An in-depth analysis of the reasons behind it shows the non-long-term nature of the war in southern Xinjiang, the advantages of Chengdu's geographical location, and the strategic considerations of the location of the military region's organs. The historical legacy of this change still plays an active role in the construction of today's army and has become an important milestone in the development of the squadron.

An in-depth analysis of the 1985 "Chengdu-Kunming Change": The Adjustment of the Military Region under the Million-Dollar Disarmament" analyzes in detail the strategic decision-making process of the Kunming Military Region being merged into the Chengdu Military Region in the 1985 million-dollar disarmament, revealing the deep-seated strategic considerations and historical reasons. Through the lens of history, this article allows readers to understand more clearly the complex adjustment of the squadron in the disarmament trend.

First of all, the article provides readers with the background of the pre-disarmament squadron by reviewing the 1985 million-dollar disarmament. In the face of a huge military strength and various problems, the Central Military Commission decided to carry out a new round of streamlining and reorganization, focusing on the readjustment of large military regions. This comprehensive restructuring of the armed forces laid the groundwork for the later "Chengkun Change."

Secondly, the article deeply analyzes the reasons behind the "Chengdu-Kunming Change" between the Kunming Military Region and the Chengdu Military Region. Through the special nature of the war in southern Xinjiang, the complexity of the Kunming Military Region's organs is explained. At the same time, the superiority of Chengdu's geographical location and convenient transportation have become important factors to consider in retaining the Chengdu Military Region. This digging into the historical factors behind strategic considerations makes it easier for readers to understand the complex trade-offs that policymakers make in disarmament.

While pointing out the deep-seated reasons for the "Chengdu-Kunming Change," the article also conducts an in-depth analysis of the impact of the Kunming Military Region's withdrawal from the historical stage. It is mentioned that the senior generals of the former Kunming Military Region became the mainstay of the later army construction, especially the first and others, so that the historical legacy of the "Chengkun Change" continues to play an important role in the construction of the first squadron. This focus on historical heritage allows readers to understand not only the complexities of decision-making, but also the positive impact of this change on army building.

Finally, the article summarizes the "Chengkun Change" as an important milestone in the development of the squadron. Through an in-depth analysis of the war in southern Xinjiang, its geographical advantages, and the location of the military region's organs, readers have a deeper understanding of the complexity of this historical event. At the end of the article, the "Chengkun Change" is positioned as an important milestone in the development of the squadron, which is not only a respect for history, but also an incentive for the development of the army.

Overall, through an in-depth analysis of the 1985 "Chengkun Change", this article gives readers a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the historical background, strategic decisions and impacts of that time. Through detailed narration and analysis, the article successfully leads readers to think deeply about the complex decisions made during the disarmament period and the underlying reasons behind them, providing readers with a rich and in-depth historical Xi experience.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages