When browsing the news, I was suddenly shocked by a news "Harvard, Tsinghua University, and Peking University top students go to the grassroots level of the street, and the manager of a private enterprise in Hangzhou is directly the leader". The content is roughly: Recently, the leading cadres of the Organization Department of a district in Hangzhou City publicized information showing that Yu Mouyu, a private enterprise personnel, a native of Hangzhou, Zhejiang, with a graduate degree, was born in 1988, a person outside the party, and was proposed to be the deputy leader of the street.
Doesn't it say that civil servants "must take the exam every time they enter"?Now I can transfer directly from the private sector to the civil service?And, as soon as you come in, it's a leadership position - a street deputy!I don't know if it's unheard of, but it seems that I have never seen a precedent for such an operation.
Looking further down, I realized that this was the "first case in the country". Since it is the "first case", it is normal not to have heard of it. However, this approach does not seem to be in line with the Civil Servants Law
Sure enough, the news of the appointment of senior executives of private enterprises as leading cadres immediately sparked heated discussions among netizens. Some people think that this is a meritocracy, and the hero does not ask where he comes from;Some people also think that it is to open the door for related households.
In response to the controversy in the society, the ZZ Department of the Xiaoshan District Party Committee responded that Yu Liyu's identity was publicly and strictly identified by the ZZ Department of the (Hangzhou) Municipal Party Committee. "This is an elite selection organized by the whole city of Hangzhou, and the relevant plans are all studied by the city", "The big policy orientation is to broaden the selection and employment of people."
On the morning of August 19, the staff of the Cadre Supervision Office of the ZZ Department of the Xiaoshan District Party Committee told ** that Yu Liyu's identity had been publicly and strictly identified by the Organization Department of the Municipal Party Committee, and there would be no problem. This public election is different from the past, some boundaries have been broken, "what was not in the past does not mean that there is no now, as long as it is standardized, it is okay."
Curious, I entered the name of the person to be promoted, and only then did I know that the name of this private enterprise personnel is Yu Liyu, with a graduate education, and he was originally a foreign trade manager of a private enterprise. Moreover, the announcement of his position as a street deputy was not "recently", to be precise, it was in August 2020. Netizens turned out this matter again, in fact, they were "stirring up old news".
After 2020, there are still netizens who have dug up three academic qualifications, went abroad to make a master's degree, and returned to the subsidiary of Kangsheng Co., Ltd., where his father is a director, as a foreign trade manager, in order to be selected by the Organization Department of Xiaoshan District, and use the sales data of the entire department as their own performance ......Etcetera. Don't believe these rumors that have not been confirmed.
The practice of transferring leading cadres from private enterprises has obviously brought a very strong signal
The current direction of reform is to break the "iron rice bowl" of "civil servants" and to broaden the "entrance" on the one hand and smooth the "exit" on the other. The reforms sought to expand access to the civil service. The transfer of cadres from private enterprises is a reflection of the concept of "appointing people on the basis of merit", as long as they are excellent people, they can become the object of inspection and be included in the organization.
The scope of obtaining the status of civil servants may also be further broadened, the traditional four-piece set of "examination and transfer selection", coupled with today's private enterprise elites, the selection and employment channels are wider, and it can better reflect the "capable one".
Exports are also expanding, and under various evaluation and assessment mechanisms, the "elimination" mechanism in the system will be further improved in the future. Cadres who "lie flat" will have a hard time in the system.
Therefore, whether this kind of exploration will be further expanded in the future, I think it is indeed worth observing and "letting the bullets fly for a while".
But at the moment, the legitimacy of this practice is worth taking seriously. After all, judging from the later news, Hangzhou is not alone in being transferred from a private enterprise to a leading position as a civil servant. I won't list it here, and interested friends will do it themselves.
According toRegulations on the Transfer of Civil Servants:Transfer.
It can be seen that there are several hard conditions for transferring to civil servants:
1.Object
State-owned enterprises, schools and graduate students, and other public institutions;
(Note that private enterprises are not included).
2.conditions
Persons engaged in public service;
3.Appointment
Hold a leadership position or a fourth-level researcher or above.
It can be seen that private enterprises are not in this category, nor are they engaged in public servants, so they do not meet the qualifications for transfer.
Of course, since it is a reform, it is not impossible to make a breakthrough, but without the authorization of the superiors, this breakthrough is a little bigger. If the whole country follows up in this way, won't the civil servants' "compulsory examination every time they enter" become an ornament?
In fact, despite the many controversies, in the current environment, the selection of civil servants through examinations is still relatively efficient and fair. If they all operate like the Xiaoshan District Organization Department, ordinary people may have no future. If you want to fight for connections, background, money and power, small town writers have no advantage, and it is even more difficult for poor families to have noble children. I think this is the reason why this news can cause an uproar in both the system and social **.