There are always people on the Internet who criticize the evaluation of teachers' professional titles, saying that they are reluctant to engage in teaching if they are evaluated as deputy senior teachers.
I think this statement is unscientific and unreasonable, and it is a partial generalization. Some people say that there is a phenomenon that associate senior teachers do not teach or that teaching becomes lighter, but this is because the teachers who are rated as deputy senior teachers are generally older. The title of the teacher is evaluated from level to level, and it took many years to meet the evaluation of the intermediate level, and it took many years to meet the evaluation of the deputy senior level, and the evaluation criteria also set many conditions, so when the teacher can be rated as a deputy senior title, the age is generally not young.
Except for a few highly educated and highly capable teachers, only then can they be young associate senior teachers. Since most of the teachers who can be rated with the deputy senior title are older, the fundamental reason why some teachers with the deputy senior title do not teach or become lighter in teaching is not because he is rated as a deputy senior title, but because he is too old to bear the heavy burden.
If it is really true that teachers' titles are automatically promoted according to their teaching experience, will there be a phenomenon that all old senior teachers will appear and more teachers with deputy senior titles will not be engaged in teaching?What are your thoughts on this, and share them with you.