At that time, when the "Xinjiang cotton" humiliated China, domestic stars stood up to defend the dignity of the country. However, in this wave of boycotts, some celebrities chose to continue to cooperate with the "Insulting China" brand, which attracted widespread attention. We'll focus on a few of them, deciphering their actions one by one, and seeing what kind of story is behind them.
1. The avant-garde and fashionable Karen Mok.
Karen Mok, with her dual identity as ** and movies, has always attracted much attention. However, a collaboration in 2021 put her in the spotlight. At the same time as releasing the MV of the new song, he was wearing the costume of Dolce & Gabbana, a brand that had been suspected of insulting China due to advertising problems, which attracted criticism from netizens. In this turmoil, Karen Mok did not choose to terminate the contract decisively, but chose to go against the wind, which made people puzzled by her approach. What was the reason for her to take the plunge and choose to continue working with the brand?
2. Tang Yan's brand choice is difficult.
Tang Yan, who became popular with dramas such as "The Legend of Sword and Fairy III", once became the representative of the "post-85 Xiaohuadan". However, her mistake in brand selection surprised netizens. In the "insulting China" incident, Tang Yan successively cooperated with two insulting brands, namely Swarovski and Fresh Silk. The image of a star has always been closely related to the choice of the brand, and whether Tang Yan's decisions will have a profound impact on her career and reputation has become a topic worth paying attention to.
3. Yang Zi's dilemma.
Yang Zi, born as a child star, is loved for her excellent acting skills and sunny and honest image. However, her choice in the "Coach" brand incident caused confusion among netizens. Knowing that the brand had listed Hong Kong and Taiwan as independent countries, Yang Zi still cooperated with the brand after the incident, which aroused the doubts of netizens. Compared with the decisive termination of other stars, will Yang Zi's dilemma have a long-term negative impact on her career and image in the future?
4, Liu Yifei's mystery of silence.
Liu Yifei is an American citizen but has always been active in the Chinese entertainment industry. In the "Xinjiang Cotton" incident, many celebrities terminated their contracts with the brand, but Liu Yifei chose to remain silent. Whether she chose not to express her position for a special reason has caused speculation among netizens. On this issue, what kind of considerations Liu Yifei's behavior is based on is a mystery worth digging into.
5. Zhang Liangying's public welfare "two sides".
Zhang Liangying, who became popular because of the song "My Dream", became a high-profile singer. However, in the context of BOSS Hugo Boss's cooperation with the insulting Chinese brand, her choice is puzzling. In a "public welfare" publicity, she wore clothes that insulted the Chinese brand, and this "two-faced" behavior attracted widespread public attention. How Zhang Liangying views her brand cooperation and public welfare image has become a question worth pondering.
Summary:
The brand choice of celebrities has always been the focus of attention. In the face of national interests, how celebrities should regulate their behavior has become an important issue. Every decision they make can have a profound impact on their career and image. In the future, celebrities may need to weigh the relationship between brand cooperation and national interests more carefully, and make choices that are more in line with public expectations.