The celebrity was forced to donate by netizens, and the situation escalated

Mondo Entertainment Updated on 2024-01-30

Gansu ** has shocked the hearts of hundreds of millions of Chinese, whether ordinary people or celebrities, they have reached out to the disaster area. Celebrities participate in charity activities to set an example for the public and call on more people to volunteer for love. However, as a public figure, every act of charity of the celebrity has attracted much attention.

Sometimes, even if they deliberately do good deeds in a low-key manner, they will be interpreted as controversy by netizens. On December 19, the China Siyuan Project ** Association released an article to thank Na Ying, a leading figure in the mainland music scene, for donating relief materials to the disaster area in Gansu.

The article only mentioned that Na Ying donated relief tents, but did not specify the specific number, which aroused suspicion among netizens. Some netizens believe that Na Ying has been in the whirlpool, whether this low-key donation is intended to reshape the public image.

In fact, Na Ying did not take the initiative to make the donation public, but silently contributed at a critical moment, resulting in many people not knowing about it. Netizens have a wait-and-see attitude towards this, but Na Ying's low-key donation behavior should not be a reason for netizens to speculate on her self-whitewashing.

What's even more interesting is that Na Ying's fans used this incident to call for Daolang to donate, which sparked controversy. The 52-year-old singer Daolang once again became the focus of netizens' attention and became the target of forced donations. The moral pressure of celebrities. Whether it is Na Ying or Daolang, as stars, they shoulder the moral pressure imposed by fans.

In the eyes of the public, celebrities earn more than ordinary people, so when society is facing difficulties, celebrities should make more contributions and become role models for charity. Under the double pressure of fans and social expectations, celebrities are more likely to become the target of netizens' forced donations.

Na Ying did not disclose the specific amount of donations to the disaster area in Gansu, which caused netizens to speculate whether it was just perfunctory in exchange for a good reputation. And Daolang had announced that he would be in retreat for one to three years to concentrate on ** creation before the occurrence of ** in Gansu, and because of a sentence from Na Ying's fans, he became a star who was forced to donate.

In the eyes of the public, celebrities no longer seem to be ordinary people, and they seem to have lost the right to make independent choices, and can only follow other stars to participate in charity activities in order to avoid being tied to the moral shame pillar. The financial situation of the star. Daolang was forced to donate, in addition to Na Ying's historical origins, it is also inseparable from his personal economic situation.

After being silent for many years, Daolang returned to the music scene in July this year with "Rakshasa Sea City", rekindling the enthusiasm of music fans. The song sparked widespread discussion on the Internet because of its strong irony and symbolism, and it hit an astonishing 8 billion views in just 11 days after it was launched, and was directly praised as a divine comedy by netizens.

However, it was precisely because of this song that Daolang once again became the focus of public attention, and netizens began to ask him for donations. Of course, donations should be voluntary, and moral pressure should not be imposed on them because of fame or income.

Donations should first be made on the basis of personal financial allowability, and secondly, on personal will. At special moments, public welfare should come from inner love, rather than driven by external pressure.

Daolang's fans have come forward to defend him, pointing out that Daolang has been living a low-key life since he became famous, not accepting interviews, not participating in shows, and not holding concerts. Therefore, all the income is earned through ** creation.

In addition, Daolang has been silently carrying out public welfare undertakings, and the total amount of donations in recent years has exceeded 20 million. The reason why Daolang did not make a public donation does not mean that he does not do charity. The amount of donations should not be a reason for the moral kidnapping of celebrities.

The online environment should be purified, and celebrities should not become the object of netizens forcing donations and donations. True charity should be to spread love and respect the freedom to donate, rather than pouring cold water on the whole society when it is giving love. It is not those who donate less, but those who do not donate but speak coldly.

Respecting each individual's individual rights and doing one's best is a contribution and dedication to society. Don't do it because it's small, and don't do it because it's small. A kind word is also a way to show love.

Related Pages