When I was a child, my grades were good, why did the low-level students lose at the starting line of education?Linyang2000 Perspectives Revisited.
Ten years ago, Linyang2000 set off a heated discussion in the Tianya Forum, putting forward the view that "it is difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family", which attracted widespread attention. He believes that poor students are at a disadvantage in the competition for education, and the material gap hinders the upward mobility of children at the bottom. Now, 10 years later, can we reach a definitive conclusion on this issue?
Linyang2000's view is that there are rights and wrongs, and whether the bottom can rise depends on material conditions or family educationIn my opinion, the issue is not black and white.
The wrestling of homeschooling: material conditions vsEducational concept.
The role of material conditions in boosting children's academic performance cannot be ignored, and the superior resources of wealthy families do provide children with unique advantages. However, material disparities are not the only factor that hinders the success of children at the bottom, but more importantly, differences in family education.
The concept of family has a huge impact: the concept of education is inseparable from the growth of children.
Many years ago, a thought-provoking ** showed the contrast between two mothers with their children on the subway. The child on the left reads quietly, while the child on the right is addicted to the phone. This reflects the influence of family values on children's development. It has been observed that children with excellent grades tend to come from parents with good academic knowledge and family conditions. This has led to reflection on the achievement gap between children from poor rural families and children in urban areas.
The road to counterattack for children at the bottom: talent, hard work and challenge.
In prestigious universities, rural children often excel, but the story behind them is thought-provoking. It has been observed that these children rely on extraordinary effort and dedication in addition to their talents. However, their families generally lack well-educated parents and relatively comfortable living conditions.
Backward educational concepts: the dilemma of children from poor families.
Children from poor rural families face double pressure, both from the lack of material conditions and from the lag of family education. Parents find it difficult to pay attention to their children's studies due to the pressure of making ends meet, which leads to huge difficulties for the latter in the process of growing up. The talents of children at the bottom are bound to the shackles of material conditions and educational concepts.
Why not let grandparents take their children: a clash of intergenerational ideas.
Nowadays, parents are reluctant to let grandparents take care of their children, which reflects the collision of intergenerational concepts. It was observed that young parents were more inclined to provide their children with quality books and educational toys, while grandparents were more willing to buy snacks and "rough" toys. This difference not only comes from the difference in the growth environment, but also reflects the difference in the concept of family education.
The plight of children at the bottom: the double attack of material and education.
In rural areas, the plight of children at the bottom is particularly acute. Differences in life experiences lead to a relative lack of interests and academic performance among children at the bottom of the group. It has been observed that children from poor families are more likely to indulge in snacks and rough toys and lack interest in books and Xi. This reflects the dilemma of children at the bottom who are facing the double attack of material and education, and it is difficult to counterattack.
The counterattack road of the children at the bottom: change the congenital and operate the acquired.
Children at the bottom face huge challenges if they want to fight back. Material conditions are important, but the concept of family education is also crucial. Families at the bottom need to get rid of the traditional mode of thinking, focus on cultivating children's interests and knowledge, and strive to change the limitations of congenital conditions. In the material conditions that cannot be changed, the key lies in how to manage the acquired conditions of the child and get rid of the vicious circle of the Matthew effect.
The helplessness of parents at the bottom: the inability to choose under the pressure of livelihood.
However, while criticizing parents at the bottom for not being able to accompany their children and support their children's learning Xi, we should also see their helplessness. The pressure of work makes it impossible for parents to relieve themselves from the hardships of life and provide a better environment for their children to learn Xi. Parents struggle to survive between making a living and raising children, and their tired hands have long been unable to hold books easily.
The dilemma of the counterattack of the children at the bottom: education is their own business.
It is the responsibility of parents to educate their children, regardless of their profession. Parents need to find a balance between earning a living and raising children, and cannot blindly pursue money at the expense of their children's growth. Parents at the bottom need to rationally consider their children's future while struggling to survive, and try their best to create better acquired conditions for them.
The way of counterattack of children at the bottom: change their concepts and work hard.
In general, children at the bottom do face difficulties if they want to counterattack. Material conditions and educational concepts are the two major peaks pressing on them. However, material poverty is not the only constraint, but more importantly, the limitation of the concept of family education. Only by changing the traditional mode of thinking, paying attention to children's interests and knowledge, and striving to get rid of the double attack of material and concept, can the children at the bottom be expected to achieve a counterattack and break the Matthew effect of the vicious circle.
This article profoundly analyzes the many dilemmas faced by children at the bottom in the process of education and growth, and analyzes them from multiple perspectives such as material conditions, family education concepts and intergenerational concepts. Through vivid examples and detailed observations, the author presents these issues vividly and thought-provokingly.
First of all, this paper makes a profound analysis of the relationship between material conditions and educational concepts. From the author's point of view, material conditions affect the academic performance of children at the bottom to a certain extent, but more importantly, the difference in the concept of family education. This point of view has a certain practical significance, especially in today's society, the bottom families are generally facing material scarcity, but some families can still raise outstanding children through the correct concept of education.
Secondly, through the comparison of urban and rural children's educational concepts, this paper emphasizes the far-reaching impact of educational concepts on children's growth. Urban children are more comfortable with their parents' accompaniment and education, while rural children still face great difficulties despite their outstanding talents in the absence of family education. This has led to a deep reflection on educational equity and equal opportunities, and to reflect on whether social resources can be distributed more evenly.
In addition, the article highlights the collision of intergenerational concepts through the phenomenon of grandmothers taking children. Modern parents are reluctant to let grandparents take care of their children, which reflects the difference in family education concepts. This phenomenon provokes deep reflection on the conflict between tradition and modernity, between concept and reality, and also reflects the impact of social changes on family relations.
Finally, the article summarizes the ways of counterattack of children at the bottom, emphasizing the importance of changing concepts and focusing on cultivating children's interests and knowledge. This gives readers a positive enlightenment, that is, regardless of the material conditions, through the correct educational concept and hard work, the children at the bottom are still expected to achieve a counterattack and break the shackles of poverty.
Overall, this article does a good job of digging deep into social issues and carefully observing phenomena. Through an in-depth analysis of the plight of children at the bottom of the group in the process of growing up, it triggers the reader's reflection on educational equity, family concept and social opportunities.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!