College students try to find a job on their own, only to find that they can't find their dream job. It's not that society doesn't need college students, it's that there are too many college students and too few who are outstanding. Perhaps, the problem of the job market is not a social problem, but a problem of university education. The general lack of awareness of problems among college students has become a dilemma for their development.
Traditional education requires students to learn book knowledge, and only Xi related to book knowledge is tested during the exam, but social practice is not examined. Even now, the difficulty of the exam has increased, the number of comprehensive Xi questions has increased, and the number of exam questions has also increased, but it has not extended to the social level, especially the liberal arts things, only to test the ability to solve problems, and even just let students talk about things, but it has not examined whether they are deeply involved in social practice and whether they have their own views on social issues. All Xi questions are based on standard answers, without too much expansion and extension. The teacher has a standard for judging the mark, and the student's answer must be suitable for the scoring standard, which greatly restricts the thinking and cannot expand and extend. As a result, there is a general lack of awareness of the problem among both middle and university students.
As long as you learn the book knowledge solidly, and then do some Xi questions on the tutorial materials, you can get a good score, as for social practice, basically no, thinking about social problems, will not appear. So, how can college students find their ideal career in the face of a complex society?It is true that many good positions have been held by the powerful for a long time, and new graduates cannot jump to such positions, but college students should also reflect on whether there is something wrong with their university education. I just read books and do experiments, but I don't understand society, I don't ask why, I am often led by the nose by capital and power, and I don't have any thoughts of my own. The liberal arts do not emphasize experimentation, and the science does not emphasize social theory, and basically they go their own ways, independent of each other, do not cultivate interdisciplinary thinking, and do not develop interest in basic problems. Even in their own subjects, university students are not interested in basic issues, do not doubt them, but use them directly. It is not difficult for a person to be interested in basic issues. Perhaps the common human curiosity is enough to make anyone interested in any fundamental question, what is really difficult is that one is unwilling to take an interest in a fundamental question. In fact, the basic problems are where the discipline is established, and being interested in the basic problems is the starting point of research, not directly using it, let alone without doubt, just following the direction of the teacher's guidance.
University research is mostly a closed system and does not go to the market. If the research is directly linked to the market, it will generate a very strong internal drive. Imagine that when graduate students and doctoral students engage in research, they will become scientists who earn a lot of money and become leaders in the research of new products by accepting social investment. However, due to the rigid system of universities, graduate or doctoral students cannot meet the needs of the market, and only engage in research under the guidance of their supervisors. And the mentor "Chunjiang Plumbing Duck Prophet", founded his own business, became the boss, based on scientific research, in addition to selling hardware products, is to sell services, and made a lot of money. The graduate students or doctoral students led by the supervisor have become part-time workers for the supervisor, and can only receive basic living expenses for a month, but they conduct research for the enterprises founded by the supervisor. As long as the supervisor does not retire, the graduate or doctoral students led by the supervisor will continue to work for the supervisor and research new products. In other words, only the supervisor can control the scientific experiment, and the social capital cannot freely enter the research field, so it can only run its own laboratory and recruit experimenters to conduct research. As a result, college students, especially those engaged in scientific research, lack the competitiveness and the spirit of free competition in the market, and some are just obedient, even if they are treated as cheap labor, and are oppressed and exploited by their mentors, they feel very normal.
Scholarship should have the spirit of humanism, and it should also have capital as the driving force. Relying on the command of power and the guidance of mentors does not necessarily produce good academic results, and some only pick up people's wisdom, or export to domestic sales, but ultimately cannot meet the market demand. It is very appropriate to call the university an ivory tower, because most of the college students and university teachers are not close to the ground, only focus on the study and Xi research, but lack interest in the basic problems of the subject, and cannot fully adapt to the needs of the market, then, the study of Xi and research is only for graduation, mixed with a diploma, not for innovation, let alone for entrepreneurship. With a college diploma, at least it can prove that college students have "ability", but they may not really be able to adapt to social positions. For this reason, many universities offer majors that are closely related to social careers. Under this influence, there are two types of graduate students, one is an academic master's degree and the other is a professional master's degree. Academic masters focus on doing experiments, while professional masters also do experiments, but the focus is on adapting to the needs of society. Even so, many college students still can't find a suitable job.
However, the development of universities prematurely adapted to the market demand, absorbed social investment, and established private universities, and as a result, universities began to industrialize and mass-produce college students, of course, they did not have too strong adaptability. After the expansion of university enrollment, the quality of college students themselves has declined, and they lack the awareness of problems and the spirit of study. Perhaps, after experiencing some social events, college students have seen the direction of social development clearly, felt the coercion of power and the inducement of capital, and felt the humility of their own abilities, so they can only be "refined egoists".
College students don't ask why, it's not that they don't have that quality, but they can't do it, they don't dare to ask, and it's inconvenient to ask. Instead of focusing on a lot of social issues, it is more realistic to read good books and find a good job. That is to say, if college students have a sense of problems, they will continue to ask some social problems, and they will also discover the secrets of the collusion of power and capital, of course, there will be some social incidents, in the eyes of the rulers, they have become a factor of social instability, it is better to let them only study their own majors, do a good job of research, there is no need to be interested in basic issues, and there is no need to continue to ask. As a result, college students have learned to be self-reliant, and have learned to seek their own way out, as for social problems, they are always emerging, ** or the object of their thinking?And once the college students, as the intellectual elite, lose their awareness of the problem, the society can develop arbitrarily under the conspiracy of power and capital, as for **, it is only the object of power and capital manipulation, it is easy to be swayed, and college students have long been out of attention, and **will become the "youth of the times"?