The CSC judging seems to have been a mystery all along, but it's not. The "CSC Evaluation Rules" have been quantified one by one, and there are some points that have been seriously ignored by everyone, but they actually account for a large proportion, which may be the reason why some students are unfortunately brushed. This time, I will give you a general analysis from the following six aspects.
1. The applicant's comprehensive quality [weight 20%]:This part is considered to be valued by everyone, I am afraid that in the hearts of many students, the proportion has exceeded 50%, but it is reallyOnly 20 points. 2. The research level of the destination country and the institution of study in the selected discipline and professional field [weight 20%]:
This part of the gapIt's easy to get biggerIn addition to the overall level of the school to which you are applying, the level of the school in the chosen subject is also very important.
3. Foreign tutors [weight 20%]:This is a factor that is seriously overlooked. The level of the tutor and whether there is any connection with the applicant's domestic tutor and unit. If you are applying for a fledgling mentor and you have no prior cooperation, and the other person is applying for a long-term cooperation with his lab, thenThis gap may not be able to be made up by no amount of sci.
Fourth, the major to be studied [weight 15%]:
This depends on whether the major is strongly supported by the state, you can search the list of national key funded disciplines to see if there is a major for you, if not, try to set it up.
5. The necessity of studying abroad and the feasibility of the study plan [weight 15%]:
I'm sure you've realized the importance of a study plan, but everyone's study plan is a relatively small field, and the reviewers may not know your field of study, especially science and engineeringAs long as your training plan is logical, it looks like that, and then guarantees a certain length, showing that you have a clear plan, and you should be able to get a high score, and the gap will not be very large.
It is also important to note that:The existence of a partnership is a very important factor that is overlooked。If you have one, be sure to mention it in your study plan;If not, try to find a way to beautify, for example, if you have communicated with a foreign tutor by email or Skype many times.
6. The applicant's unit's recommendation attitude and the evaluation of the applicant's internal evaluation stage by each selection unit [weight 10%]:
The evaluation of the on-campus review stage on the last page of the evaluation form may be more important for students in joint training, while for students who are pursuing a Ph.D., as long as you fill in your opinions, it is estimated that there will be no difference, because everyone is almost the same, and they are all virtual.
The CSC review is not to select the students with the best personal conditions, but to select the most suitable students, the students who need the most funding, the most promising ones on this study abroad trip, and the students who are most likely to become the talents urgently needed by the country.
Everyone is welcome to communicate and discuss in the comment area