On 7 October, Hamas launched a series of attacks on Israel, which caught the Israeli armed forces by surprise. The attack sparked a heated debate within Israel about who was responsible for the Hamas attacks. It is a huge failure for Israel to prepare for a massive attack that Hamas has done a lot of preparation before the attack, while Israel is unprepared. The head of Israel's intelligence agency has publicly admitted to dereliction of duty, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been criticized for it. He has said that he had received no intelligence or warnings prior to the attack, intending to shift the blame to the intelligence agencies. However, this statement caused strong discontent in Israeli political circles, which believed that Netanyahu's remarks could undermine Israel's internal unity. In an attempt to calm the situation, Netanyahu eventually retracted his remarks and publicly apologized.
Hamas's raids have had a big impact on Israel. The discussion began about the reasons for the Hamas attacks and the question of who was responsible. The reaction to the incident within Israel has been intense, with heated debates about who is to blame for the failure. Hamas was well prepared before the attack, but the Israeli side did not respond effectively, and the attack was indeed a serious failure for Israel. The head of the intelligence agency has publicly admitted to making mistakes, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been blamed for the attack. He claimed that no intelligence or warnings had been received prior to the attack, a claim that was in effect an attempt to shift the blame to the intelligence agencies. However, this attitude has caused a backlash in Israeli political circles, as it may have undermined Israel's internal unity. To alleviate this pressure, Netanyahu eventually retracted his remarks and publicly apologized.
The New York Times reported that according to documents, emails and interview information obtained by the **, as early as more than a year ago, Israel obtained a document on Hamas's operational plan, which was named the "Jericho Wall" by Israel**, and has about 40 pages detailing the specific actions of the potential attack. Although no specific timing of Hamas's attack was given, the document outlines possible attack scenarios almost individually. At the time, however, the Israeli military and intelligence services deemed the document unrealistic and that Hamas could not achieve its plans. However, Hamas eventually completed the attack with astonishing precision. More shockingly, the New York Times revealed that in July this year, an analyst in Israel's intelligence service issued a warning that Hamas had conducted training Xi in line with the plan, but the warning did not attract the attention of the Israeli military and intelligence**. That is, Israel could have had the opportunity to respond effectively to the Hamas attack, but was caught off guard by the contempt for the threat.
Recently, the American New York Times revealed some shocking facts. According to documents, emails and interviews obtained by the **, Israel had been provided with a document on Hamas's operational plan more than a year ago. The document, which was dubbed the "Jericho Wall" by Israel**, is about 40 pages long and describes in detail the possible attack. While the document does not explicitly give a specific time for Hamas to launch an attack, it outlines possible attack scenarios almost individually. However, at the time, the Israeli military and intelligence services did not consider this document to be realistic, and they believed that Hamas was not capable of implementing the relevant plans. However, Hamas eventually completed the attack with shocking precision. In further surprise, the New York Times also revealed that in July this year, an analyst in Israel's intelligence service issued a warning that Hamas had conducted training Xi in line with the plan, but this warning did not attract the attention of the Israeli military and intelligence**. That is, Israel would have had the opportunity to respond effectively to the Hamas attack, but was caught off guard by the contempt for the threat.
On the issue of responsibility for the Hamas attacks, it has been made clear within Israel that this issue will not be ignored and that an investigation will be launched and further accountability will be launched after the conflict is over. Netanyahu will face even more trouble if he fails to turn the tide. The US media reports have further exacerbated the controversy within Israel and put Netanyahu under more pressure. According to reports, initially intelligence services considered Hamas's attack plan unrealistic, but their judgment proved to be wrong. If Netanyahu had known or read the Jericho Wall document at the time, they would have faced an even greater dilemma in the face of a political crisis. However, if Netanyahu did not know about the existence of this document, then they could clear their hands to a certain extent and be exempt from the political crisis. The previous public apology may have come a little too soon. It is worth mentioning that Netanyahu returned to the post of prime minister in December last year, and whether he is aware of the existence of this document is still inconclusive. There is a consensus within Israel that the attack will not be let go easily, and that Netanyahu will face even more trouble if he fails to turn the tide.
On the issue of responsibility for the Hamas attacks, Israel has made it clear internally that they will not forget the issue and that they will investigate it once the conflict is over and pursue accountability. If Netanyahu can't turn the tide, he will face an even more dire situation. The New York Times report has exacerbated the controversy within Israel and increased the pressure on Netanyahu. Initially, intelligence services thought Hamas's attack plan was unrealistic, but their judgment proved wrong, the report said. If Netanyahu** had known or seen the Jericho Wall document at the time, they would have been in an even more difficult situation in the face of a political crisis. However, if Netanyahu did not know about the existence of this document, then they could prove their innocence to some extent and avoid a political crisis. The previous public apology may have been a little premature. However, it is uncertain whether Netanyahu was aware of the document's existence, which further complicates the situation. There is a consensus within Israel that the attack will not be resolved easily, and that Netanyahu will face even more serious problems if he fails to turn the tide.
The internal Israeli dispute has not only put pressure on Netanyahu**, but also exacerbated the complexity and uncertainty of the Palestinian-Israeli situation. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict has entered a stage of escalation, and the battlefield confrontation between the two sides has been escalating. And internal Israeli strife could lead to more obstacles, making it more difficult to reach a comprehensive ceasefire. The situation is already very tense, and any further disagreements could trigger even greater conflict. It is unclear how the situation will develop in the future, but it is foreseeable that internal disputes will bring more complexity and variables to the resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli situation.
The internal Israeli dispute has not only put pressure on Netanyahu**, but also exacerbated the complexity and uncertainty of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. At present, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has entered a stage of escalation, and the fighting between the two sides is constantly escalating. Intra-Israel strife is likely to create additional obstacles and make a comprehensive ceasefire more difficult. The situation is already very tense, and any further disagreements could trigger a larger conflict. It is not yet clear how the situation will develop in the future, but it is foreseeable that internal disputes will bring more complexity and uncertainty to the resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.