Body:
In July 1982, seven years after Chiang Kai-shek's death, Chiang Ching-kuo wrote in an article in memory of his father Chiang Kai-shek: "I hope that my father's spirit can return to his homeland and be with his ancestors", expressing his remembrance of his deceased father and his nostalgia for his hometown. The CCP responded quickly, and at Deng Yingchao's suggestion, Liao Chengzhi, the son of a Kuomintang veteran, sent an open letter to Chiang Ching-kuo.
Liao Chengzhi poked his heart with words with personal private feelings and sincere feelings, and Jiang Jingguo said that he was "moved" after reading it. However, the 8 words that Song Meiling replied to after knowing it made people feel cold.
In 1960, the Kinmen Artillery Battle broke out, and the United States demanded that Chiang Kai-shek abandon Kinmen, **China. Chiang Kai-shek was unwilling to cut off Taiwan's ties with the mainland, and put forward strategies such as "Taiwan would rather be in the hands of Chiang's father and son". By 1978, Chiang Ching-kuo took over the power of the Kuomintang, and the return of the two sides of the strait took a turn for the better.
In its efforts to realize cross-strait reunification, the Chinese communists found Liao Chengzhi, who had a deep relationship with Chiang Ching-kuo. Liao Chengzhi and Chiang Ching-kuo grew up together and studied together in Moscow. He was strongly recommended to become the deputy head of the leading group for Taiwan work and contribute to the reunification of Taiwan.
In July 1986, after Deng Yingchao saw Chiang Ching-kuo's memorial letter, he proposed that Liao Chengzhi write an open letter for Chiang Ching-kuo, which became a breakthrough. Liao Chengzhi first proposed to repair the ancestral tomb of the Chiang family in an effort to reunify the two sides of the strait. Then, he handed over the ancestral tomb to Jiang Jingguo through Chen Xiangmei, and said that the Jiang family was welcome to return at any time.
After the open letter was published, it caused a sensation. After seeing the letter, Chiang Ching-kuo said that he was "moved", but in the face of Song Meiling's 8-word reply, he still adhered to the "three noes" policy.
After Chiang Ching-kuo informed Soong Meiling, she wrote back to express her attitude towards the reunification of the motherland, and viciously wrote down eight words: "I cherish myself with a broom, and I will return with a banner." Although Chiang Ching-kuo was shaken, he still adhered to the "three noes" policy.
However, **'s words brought a turnaround for ***. Chiang Ching-kuo transmitted information to Liao Chengzhi, although he insisted on the "three noes" on the surface, the secret envoy Shen Cheng traveled back and forth to the mainland many times, transmitting information for cross-strait communication and laying the groundwork for changes.
The publication of this open letter has become an important turning point, and Liao Chengzhi has made tremendous efforts to promote cross-strait reunification, which has aroused widespread attention.
The article is a detailed account of Liao Chengzhi's open letter to Chiang Ching-kuo in 1982 and the complex reactions that followed, showing the delicate moments of the time. First of all, as a representative of one of the two major families that still maintained deep ties after the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, Liao Chengzhi's open letter has a special political background and historical significance. The article gives a comprehensive interpretation of Liao Chengzhi's efforts to promote cross-strait reunification.
At the beginning of the article, seven years after Chiang Kai-shek's death, Chiang Ching-kuo's article on his father's remembrance was mentioned, and the response of the CCP to this. This reflects the position of the Chiang family in Taiwan's political system and Chiang Ching-kuo's expression of hometown and family feelings, in stark contrast. At Deng Yingchao's suggestion, Liao Chengzhi's open letter became a key node.
The article highlights the deep relationship between Liao Chengzhi and Chiang Ching-kuo, from their father's generation to their youth studying together in Moscow, and Liao Chengzhi's suggestion for Chiang Ching-kuo to repair the ancestral tomb of the Chiang family.
After the publication of the open letter, it not only attracted the attention of Chiang Ching-kuo, but also received a response. The article highlights the complexity and sensitivity of *** by describing ***'s attitude. In particular, the mention of *** in the article means that "he has his difficulties, which is understandable." Don't keep a straight face, he can't come forward himself, he can let others come forward." This is not only an understanding of Chiang Ching-kuo, but also a pragmatic attitude toward the issue of cross-strait reunification.
Finally, the article also touched on Song Meiling's reply, showing that she still adhered to the "three noes" policy and expressed a negative attitude towards the Jiang family's call for reunification. This echoes her different political positions with Chiang Ching-kuo in history, giving the whole story more drama and emotional tension.
In general, through the restoration and interpretation of the incident of Liao Chengzhi's open letter to Chiang Ching-kuo, this article deeply analyzes the complexity of the first at that time, the involvement of family feelings, and the positions of all parties on the issue of reunification. The meticulous description of this historical moment presents readers with a rich and multi-layered historical picture, which provokes in-depth thinking about the politics and interpersonal relations of the time.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!