Recently, the behavior of some self-leading car critics and institutions has made people feel indignant. For their own selfish interests, they do not hesitate to deviate from professional standards, maliciously smear specific brand models and mislead consumers without any lower limit. In the context of the booming development of China's automobile manufacturing industry, this kind of behavior not only causes great harm to enterprises, but also seriously damages the interests of consumers. The following are recent incidents of car reviewers maliciously evaluating specific brand models.
A car critic "Yao 18" conducted a malicious fuel consumption test on BYD Formula Leopard V, using the extreme abnormal driving mode, and the result was that the test fuel consumption reached 18 liters, which had a serious negative impact on BYD. However, when a car evaluation agency tested the assisted driving function of Huawei Wenjie M5, it obviously favored other brands and arranged unfair test conditions to mislead the audience.
What's more, for the winter pure electric battery life test of the M7, the announced results are even more incredible, and the results are at the bottom, causing an uproar. These malicious reviews not only damage the reputation of car companies, but also mislead consumers' car purchase decisions. As a part of society, car reviewers and institutions should abide by professional ethics, treat each model objectively and fairly, and provide consumers with true and reliable information.
However, some people ignore this and do not hesitate to distort the facts in order to pursue immediate interests, which is a serious violation of professional ethics. We call on all self-rated car reviewers and institutions to treat car reviews with a fair and objective attitude, provide consumers with more valuable information, and jointly promote the healthy development of China's auto industry. A car review chaos has triggered people's thinking about the bottom line of morality.
Recently, a test result of a new energy vehicle has attracted widespread attention. In tests, the car's range was so exaggerated that it was hard to believe. However, AITO released the background data during the test, and responded that the test seriously deviated from the real usage scenarios of users, and the test lacked basic impartiality.
The data shows that the vehicle was heated by the air conditioner for 71 minutes before the official test, and after the temperature inside the vehicle reached 24 degrees Celsius, it continued to heat for another 40 minutes, resulting in distorted test results. This has made people deeply unsettling and has deepened the questioning of the car critics. The bad behavior of the car critics has attracted more and more attention. This bad atmosphere not only has a huge impact on car companies, but also makes the majority of netizens spurn.
Car companies should also use the law to pursue the legal responsibility of these shameless people, and must not tolerate and condone them, so that these people will be punished as they deserve. Only in this way can the car critic world return to normal order. What we need is not only a fair test report, but also an ethical bottom line.