In Guizhou, in order to show his domineering attitude to his girlfriend, the man directly parked the car sideways and occupied two parking spaces, but in the face of the persuasion of other car owners, the man ignored it, but who knew that the man kicked the iron plate, and the other party came up and punched the man to the ground, and then punched and kicked directly to the hospital, and the man called the other party too violent. What the hell is going on?
Case**: Guizhou TV Station).
This man who was covered in dirt and was so aggrieved that he was about to cry was Mr. Liu, and now he was ragged and gray-headed, and some scratches could still be seen on his bare skin.
According to Mr. Liu's description, on the night of the incident, he took his new girlfriend to go shopping, and in order to facilitate parking, Mr. Liu directly occupied 2 parking spaces, and when the two got out of the car, a female car owner came to the two and dissuaded them.
However, in the face of the woman's dissuasion, Mr. Liu did not take it to heart at all, he said that there was no name written on the parking space, it belonged to the public parking space, and he did not park the car in the woman's parking space, not to mention that he occupied 2 parking spaces, even if he occupied 3, the woman could not control it.
The woman also lost her temper after hearing this, and the two immediately had a verbal quarrel, and the quarrel between the two attracted the woman's husband, Mr. Xue, who communicated with Mr. Liu in a good voice.
After all, it is not easy to find a parking space at night, Mr. Xue asked Mr. Liu to make it convenient for him to park the car in, but Mr. Liu saw that the other party was showing weakness and felt that the other party must be afraid of himself.
So Mr. Liu said arrogantly: Which green onion are you?Will you let me move it?I won't move it today, you have the ability to figure it out yourself!
Mr. Xue saw that the other party pinched himself as a soft persimmon, and instantly couldn't bear it, and threatened that if you don't move the car, don't blame yourself for being polite, Mr. Liu got out of the car directly when he saw this, and took off his shirt, and said, I want to see how you are polite.
Seeing that the other party was so arrogant, Mr. Xue punched Mr. Liu in the face without saying a word, and then kicked Mr. Liu into the flower bed, buckled him with a cross buckle, and fed him a mouthful of soil.
Afterwards, Mr. Liu was very aggrieved, he told reporters that even if he parked 2 parking spaces, Mr. Xue did not need to be ruthless, if the other party could calmly beg him to move the car, he would naturally move away, and now that he was beaten like this, he would never let Mr. Xue go.
Mr. Liu believes that Mr. Xue is simply a violent maniac who lacks education, and it is clear that it is a legal society now, how can he still have such bad behavior?He also said that he would definitely ask Mr. Xue to compensate for medical expenses, mental damages, nutrition expenses and other losses.
However, when the reporter found Mr. Xue, who came to the hospital together, he got a completely different answer, Mr. Xue said that Mr. Liu was very arrogant at that time, and began to scold his wife as soon as he got out of the car.
He and his wife communicated with Mr. Liu in a good voice at first, but the other party refused to enter the oil and salt, refused to move, and refused to move the car no matter what they said.
Who knew that in the next second, Mr. Liu got out of the car directly, and quickly took off his shirt, making a posture of wanting to beat someone, Mr. Xue saw that the situation was not right, so he hurriedly stepped forward to protect his wife behind him, and then the two sides had a physical conflict.
Mr. Xue said that Mr. Liu is a hypocrite, and he began to pretend to be pitiful if he couldn't beat himself, which is really shameless, and the two sides have completely different statements on this matter, so who is the truth?
Mr. Xue said that everything is subject to monitoring, no matter how pitiful Mr. Liu said, as long as the monitoring of the day is called out, the truth will be clear at a glance, and the reporter then went to the community where the incident occurred to understand the situation.
The reporter found that the location where Mr. Liu parked was painted with an obvious parking line, and his car did occupy 2 parking spaces, which means that it is true that Mr. Liu occupied the parking space.
Then the community security guard took the reporter to the scene of the fight between the two at that time, and the security guard said that it took a lot of effort to pull the two apart.
Then the property also took out the surveillance video, Mr. Liu saw his heroic performance, instantly blushed, and then combined the evidence of all parties and the records of the two to conduct further investigation of the case, I believe that we will soon know who is right and who is wrong.
So, how should this matter be determined legally?
Article 275 of the Civil Code stipulates that within the building zoning, the ownership of parking spaces and garages planned for parking cars shall be agreed upon by the parties through **, gift or lease;Parking spaces that occupy roads or other sites jointly owned by the owners for parking cars belong to the owners in common.
The parking space occupied by Mr. Liu belongs to the common ownership of the owners, so everyone is eligible to park, but the public parking space is for the convenience of all owners, and Mr. Liu occupies two positions alone, which has caused inconvenience to others, although it is not illegal but very immoral.
In this case, both parties were at fault for the fight, and according to the law, both parties were responsible for each other's injuries during the fight, so Mr. Xue was required to compensate Mr. Liu for medical expenses and other losses.
Article 1173 of the Civil Code stipulates that if the infringed party is at fault for the occurrence or expansion of the same damage, the liability of the infringer may be reduced. In this case, since Mr. Liu was at fault for the occurrence of the incident because Mr. Liu had provoked first, Mr. Xue's liability could be appropriately reduced.
What do you think about this?Legal gas station