As one of the famous 985 engineering colleges in China, Shandong University is a goal for many students. However, the difference in scores between different majors caused confusion among a 985 boy. He couldn't understand why some of his classmates, who scored one or two hundred points lower than him, were able to get into the same university as him. What made him even more dissatisfied was that the behavior of these students was not commensurate with his high score admission, such as smoking in the toilet and uncivilized words and deeds. With doubts and dissatisfaction, he issued a criticism of the Sino-foreign co-founders. However, the result was beyond his expectations, and the rich girl made him speechless with a sentence that crushed his emotions.
This rich girl directly pointed out that as a Sino-foreign joint student, her monthly living expenses can exceed the cost of 30 college entrance examinations for 985 boys. This sentence made the originally confident 985 boy instantly silent and felt inferior. He realized how naïve and innocent his idea of blindly using college entrance examination scores as the fairest measure of others' worth and success was. This blow also made him understand that academic performance can no longer be used as the only criterion for measuring himself and himself.
In this discussion, the students of Sino-foreign joint programs also spoke out, bringing a deeper understanding of the reality of education. Academic performance is not the only indicator that judges a student, and the role of family wealth also plays a key role. In some schools, the tuition fee of Sino-foreign joint majors is as high as hundreds of thousands of yuan, but after graduation, you can directly obtain a diploma from a foreign university, which makes the Sino-foreign joint major quite cost-effective. Some Sino-foreign joint students have spent time on the campus of Shandong University since kindergarten and have a deep understanding of the school. They are well aware that part of their income comes from the tuition fees of Sino-foreign joint program students, which allows them to enjoy not only the advantage of lower scores for admission, but also other benefits, such as gyms.
However, it should be noted that not all Sino-foreign joint students are students with low academic quality. They have made up for some of their academic shortcomings by demonstrating their abilities in other areas. Although their Gaokao scores are relatively low, it does not mean that they are lower than Shandong University in international university rankings. Moreover, these Sino-foreign co-sponsors may also become the bosses of 985 boys in the future with their own abilities. Therefore, we cannot simply underestimate or ignore the students of Sino-foreign joint ventures, who also have their own strengths and challenges.
This incident makes us reflect on the educational evaluation system, and we cannot only pursue academic performance one-sidedly. Everyone is striving to pursue their own goals and dreams, and in the process, they should be treated with mutual respect and tolerance. We can't be fair everywhere, and everyone has their own strengths and strengths. People should be able to succeed by showcasing their unique talents and abilities, rather than relying solely on gaokao scores.
For those students who are only good at studying, although they may be misunderstood as small-town problem-solvers, they also have the right to have their own world. They may have excelled in the academic field, creating unique achievements that contribute to the progress and development of society. Therefore, we should learn to appreciate everyone's strengths and efforts, and avoid having a sense of superiority because of differences.
In the face of this incident, I deeply feel that the education evaluation system needs to be more comprehensive and diversified. Academic performance is important, but it should not be the only criterion for evaluating a person's ability and worth. Everyone has their own strengths and strengths, and we should encourage and support individual development by providing more opportunities and platforms for different types of students. Only in this way can our societies become more inclusive and pluralistic, and achieve all-round development and progress.
In conclusion, this event shows us the complexity and diversity of education. Students should not simply judge others and themselves by their college entrance examination scores, but should have a more comprehensive understanding of each person's abilities and potential. Only by creating an equitable, inclusive and diverse educational environment can we cultivate more capable and responsible talents and promote the progress and development of society.